Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

🐛 Improve env.rc and create_cloud_conf.sh templates #1381

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2023
Merged

🐛 Improve env.rc and create_cloud_conf.sh templates #1381

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2023

Conversation

skatsaounis
Copy link
Contributor

@skatsaounis skatsaounis commented Nov 15, 2022 •
edited
Loading

What this PR does / why we need it:

It fixes the following erroneous situations:

  1. Scripts are run from macOS where base64 supports --break instead of --wrap
  2. For security reasons OpenStack password is present in OS_PASSWORD environment variable rather than clouds.yaml

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

  1. Please confirm that if this PR changes any image versions, then that's the sole change this PR makes.

TODOs:

  • squashed commits
  • if necessary:
    • includes documentation
    • adds unit tests

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 15, 2022
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 15, 2022 •
edited
Loading

✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 4be90a9
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack/deploys/6448e6c5e85e780008fcf648
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1381--kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Nov 15, 2022 •
edited
Loading

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: skatsaounis / name: Stamatis Katsaounis (989a8ee)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 15, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @skatsaounis!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-openstack 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-openstack has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Nov 15, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @skatsaounis. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 15, 2022
mdbooth
mdbooth requested changes Nov 29, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@mdbooth mdbooth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks ok to me, and presumably very useful if you're running it on a Mac!

Please could you remove all the whitespace and incidental changes? They make the change itself much harder to see and will also make future git spelunking harder by adding non-functional noise. If the whitespace changes are important we could consider them in a separate PR, though.

Thanks!

templates/env.rc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@seanschneeweiss
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Nov 29, 2022
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Feb 27, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Mar 29, 2023
@seanschneeweiss
Copy link
Contributor

@skatsaounis Would be great if you could address the changes proposed by @mdbooth.
Let us know if something is unclear of if you need assistance for completing this PR.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Apr 25, 2023
@skatsaounis
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi both @seanschneeweiss and @mdbooth! Sorry for such a huge delay in addressing the PR review comments.

Basically, I just removed what is not related to the changes that are fixing the issue with macOS and fetching the OS_PASSWORD from an environment variable.

I think now the PR is much more clear and ready to be merged if you agree to do so.

Once again, sorry for the delay and thank you for taking time to consider it and review it 🍻

tobiasgiese
tobiasgiese approved these changes Apr 26, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@tobiasgiese tobiasgiese left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One nit, but all in all LGTM

templates/env.rc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 26, 2023
@skatsaounis
Copy link
Contributor Author

skatsaounis commented Apr 26, 2023 •
edited
Loading

@tobiasgiese thanks for the suggestion, which makes sense. I just applied with a separate commit through the UI.

@skatsaounis skatsaounis requested a review from mdbooth April 26, 2023 08:05
@tobiasgiese
Copy link
Member

I just applied with a separate commit through the UI.

Can you please squash the commits? Prow will rebase this branch into master during merge, thus commits must be squashed :)

mdbooth
mdbooth reviewed Apr 26, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@mdbooth mdbooth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 26, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 26, 2023
@skatsaounis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tobiasgiese ✅

@skatsaounis skatsaounis requested a review from mdbooth April 26, 2023 08:56
@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jichenjc, mdbooth, skatsaounis, tobiasgiese

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [jichenjc,mdbooth,tobiasgiese]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mdbooth
Copy link
Contributor

mdbooth commented Apr 26, 2023

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 26, 2023
@skatsaounis
Copy link
Contributor Author

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Apr 26, 2023
@skatsaounis
Copy link
Contributor Author

/remove-hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 26, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit c1e9781 into kubernetes-sigs:main Apr 26, 2023
@skatsaounis skatsaounis deleted the improve-templates branch April 26, 2023 15:57
@wwentland wwentland mentioned this pull request Aug 17, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mdbooth mdbooth mdbooth approved these changes

@tobiasgiese tobiasgiese tobiasgiese approved these changes

@jichenjc jichenjc Awaiting requested review from jichenjc

Assignees

@mdbooth mdbooth

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
7 participants
@skatsaounis @k8s-ci-robot @seanschneeweiss @k8s-triage-robot @tobiasgiese @jichenjc @mdbooth