-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 263
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🐛 uplift x/net to 0.4.0 #1427
🐛 uplift x/net to 0.4.0 #1427
Conversation
x/net has vulnerabilities GO-2022-1144, GO-2022-0969, and dependency of x/net, x/text has GO-2022-1059. Uplift x/net to 0.4.0 and x/text to 0.5.0.
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
Hi @tuminoid. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/lgtm |
/ok-to-test |
/hold cancel |
/approve Thanks for your contribution! |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: tobiasgiese, tuminoid The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/cherry-pick release-0.7 |
@lentzi90: new pull request created: #1465 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
x/net has public vulnerabilities GO-2022-1144, GO-2022-0969. Uplift x/net to 0.4.0.
edit: x/text vulnerability is actually not applicable in CAPO, edited PR description. It is still uplifted as x/net requirement.
/hold