Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 api/additionalPorts: don't create UDP rules #1899

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2024

Conversation

EmilienM
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:

When providing additional ports to open on the control plane security
group, we'll only open TCP from now as it was initially documented.

Opening UDP by default might not be desired for security reasons.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #1704

/hold

When providing additional ports to open on the control plane security
group, we'll only open TCP from now as it was initially documented.

Opening UDP by default might not be desired for security reasons.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 21, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 21, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 21, 2024

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a559017
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack/deploys/65d612bfa3af7d00082161c7
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1899--kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@EmilienM EmilienM changed the title api/additionalPorts: don't create UDP rules 🐛 api/additionalPorts: don't create UDP rules Feb 21, 2024
@EmilienM
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@dulek
Copy link
Contributor

dulek commented Feb 28, 2024

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 28, 2024
@mdbooth
Copy link
Contributor

mdbooth commented Feb 28, 2024

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: EmilienM, mdbooth

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 28, 2024
@EmilienM
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 28, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 7b202d1 into kubernetes-sigs:main Feb 28, 2024
9 checks passed
@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor

jichenjc commented Mar 4, 2024

maybe we should consider add a release notes about this as we changed previous behavior

@pierreprinetti pierreprinetti deleted the issue_1704 branch October 16, 2024 12:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Our control plane security groups are too open
5 participants