Skip to content

🐛 Fix default namespace of RemediationTemplate for ClusterClass and Topology#10843

Merged
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
chess-knight:remediation_template_namespace_defaulting
Jul 9, 2024
Merged

🐛 Fix default namespace of RemediationTemplate for ClusterClass and Topology#10843
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
chess-knight:remediation_template_namespace_defaulting

Conversation

@chess-knight
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:
Adds namespace defaulting for the ClusterClass & Cluster.spec.topology.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #10805

…ology

Signed-off-by: Roman Hros <roman.hros@dnation.cloud>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Jul 8, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @chess-knight!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @chess-knight. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 8, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jul 9, 2024
@sbueringer sbueringer added the area/machinehealthcheck Issues or PRs related to machinehealthchecks label Jul 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label label Jul 9, 2024
@sbueringer sbueringer added area/clusterclass Issues or PRs related to clusterclass do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Jul 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label label Jul 9, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Thx!

/lgtm
/approve

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

DetailsGit tree hash: 14774c0eef1f78e1985c0a79729192e93b6f34ef

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 5c6f68b into kubernetes-sigs:main Jul 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.8 milestone Jul 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/clusterclass Issues or PRs related to clusterclass area/machinehealthcheck Issues or PRs related to machinehealthchecks cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Namespace defaulting missing for MachineHealtcheck's RemediationTemplate reference in ClusterClass

3 participants