Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Add PriorityQueue feature gate #11698

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer commented Jan 17, 2025

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com

What this PR does / why we need it:
I would like to propose a new feature gate for the new CR Priority Queue feature (kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime#2374). Sooner or later this will probably be the only queue implementation in CR, the feature gate would allow us to get some experience and run scale tests with the new feature.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Jan 17, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is currently missing an area label, which is used to identify the modified component when generating release notes.

Area labels can be added by org members by writing /area ${COMPONENT} in a comment

Please see the labels list for possible areas.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 17, 2025
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

If anyone has an idea which existing or potentially new area label would fit, let me know

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @fabriziopandini @chrischdi

@@ -401,6 +401,7 @@ variables:
CLUSTER_TOPOLOGY: "true"
EXP_RUNTIME_SDK: "true"
EXP_MACHINE_SET_PREFLIGHT_CHECKS: "true"
EXP_PRIORITY_QUEUE: "false"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't we want to enable it for testing?
Or at least in some test?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure how to enable this only for some tests.

I think we have to preserve our current test coverage for the feature gate being off as that is what (almost?) everyone will run in production.

I personally would mainly use this feature gate for now to enable the feature in scale tests (outside of CI)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 to experiment outside CI first

Copy link
Member

@chrischdi chrischdi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One question, otherwise

/lgtm

To your question: something like area controller-runtime 😂 or feature, but that's very generic...

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 17, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: daf98bd3e474ab1c5f0ec94e38bf0fba9433547f

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

MachinePool flake

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @vincepri

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from vincepri January 17, 2025 16:47
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

Thanks for this PR!
/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants