-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
✨ [release-0.8] Add client.StrategicMergeFrom #1413
✨ [release-0.8] Add client.StrategicMergeFrom #1413
Conversation
Hi @timebertt. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
I wasn't sure, if we can backport this feature to |
/ok-to-test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: alvaroaleman, timebertt The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Great, thank you! |
Due to kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime#1413, naive gomock expectations don't work anymore. The reason is that the `mergeFromPatch` struct has now a function attribute (`createPatch`), and as `gomega` is using `reflect.DeepEqual` under the hood, the comparison now fails: > Func values are deeply equal if both are nil; otherwise they are not deeply equal. (from https://golang.org/pkg/reflect/#DeepEqual) Hence, we introduce our own `test.EXPECTPatch()` function. Thanks to @timuthy for pointing this out.
Due to kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime#1413, naive gomock expectations don't work anymore. The reason is that the `mergeFromPatch` struct has now a function attribute (`createPatch`), and as `gomega` is using `reflect.DeepEqual` under the hood, the comparison now fails: > Func values are deeply equal if both are nil; otherwise they are not deeply equal. (from https://golang.org/pkg/reflect/#DeepEqual) Hence, we introduce our own `test.EXPECTPatch()` function. Thanks to @timuthy for pointing this out.
* make revendor generate * Get rid of third_party/forked/kubernetes * Adapt Patch() expectations of MockClient Due to kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime#1413, naive gomock expectations don't work anymore. The reason is that the `mergeFromPatch` struct has now a function attribute (`createPatch`), and as `gomega` is using `reflect.DeepEqual` under the hood, the comparison now fails: > Func values are deeply equal if both are nil; otherwise they are not deeply equal. (from https://golang.org/pkg/reflect/#DeepEqual) Hence, we introduce our own `test.EXPECTPatch()` function. Thanks to @timuthy for pointing this out. * Adapt kubelet config
* make revendor generate * Get rid of third_party/forked/kubernetes * Adapt Patch() expectations of MockClient Due to kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime#1413, naive gomock expectations don't work anymore. The reason is that the `mergeFromPatch` struct has now a function attribute (`createPatch`), and as `gomega` is using `reflect.DeepEqual` under the hood, the comparison now fails: > Func values are deeply equal if both are nil; otherwise they are not deeply equal. (from https://golang.org/pkg/reflect/#DeepEqual) Hence, we introduce our own `test.EXPECTPatch()` function. Thanks to @timuthy for pointing this out. * Adapt kubelet config
* make revendor generate * Get rid of third_party/forked/kubernetes * Adapt Patch() expectations of MockClient Due to kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime#1413, naive gomock expectations don't work anymore. The reason is that the `mergeFromPatch` struct has now a function attribute (`createPatch`), and as `gomega` is using `reflect.DeepEqual` under the hood, the comparison now fails: > Func values are deeply equal if both are nil; otherwise they are not deeply equal. (from https://golang.org/pkg/reflect/#DeepEqual) Hence, we introduce our own `test.EXPECTPatch()` function. Thanks to @timuthy for pointing this out. * Adapt kubelet config
Cherry-pick of #1406:
This PR adds
client.StrategicMergeFrom
.The function is similar to
client.{MergeFrom,MergeFromWithOptions}
, but it creates astrategic-merge-patch
instead of amerge-patch
. See doc strings for more details about the differences of the two patch types and to figure out when to use which one.Note, that strategic merge patches are not supported by CRDs.