-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 428
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🐛 Make topology markers also valid for type definitions #693
🐛 Make topology markers also valid for type definitions #693
Conversation
/retitle 🐛 Make topology markers also valid for type definitions |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: alvaroaleman, k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
I took a stab at using the new release with these changes today and am running into an issue with the way my CRD is now being generated. My CRD has fields of type env:
items:
properties:
name:
type: string
value:
type: string
valueFrom:
properties:
configMapKeyRef:
properties:
key:
type: string
name:
type: string
optional:
type: boolean
required:
- key
type: object
fieldRef:
properties:
apiVersion:
type: string
fieldPath:
type: string
required:
- fieldPath
type: object
resourceFieldRef:
properties:
containerName:
type: string
divisor:
anyOf:
- type: integer
- type: string
pattern: ^(\+|-)?(([0-9]+(\.[0-9]*)?)|(\.[0-9]+))(([KMGTPE]i)|[numkMGTPE]|([eE](\+|-)?(([0-9]+(\.[0-9]*)?)|(\.[0-9]+))))?$
x-kubernetes-int-or-string: true
resource:
type: string
required:
- resource
type: object
secretKeyRef:
properties:
key:
type: string
name:
type: string
optional:
type: boolean
required:
- key
type: object
type: object
required:
- name
type: object
type: array
x-kubernetes-list-map-keys:
- name
x-kubernetes-list-type: map Now, however, it's generated as env:
items:
properties:
name:
type: string
value:
type: string
valueFrom:
properties:
configMapKeyRef:
allOf:
- x-kubernetes-map-type: atomic
- x-kubernetes-map-type: atomic
properties:
key:
type: string
name:
type: string
optional:
type: boolean
required:
- key
type: object
fieldRef:
properties:
apiVersion:
type: string
fieldPath:
type: string
required:
- fieldPath
type: object
x-kubernetes-map-type: atomic
resourceFieldRef:
properties:
containerName:
type: string
divisor:
anyOf:
- type: integer
- type: string
pattern: ^(\+|-)?(([0-9]+(\.[0-9]*)?)|(\.[0-9]+))(([KMGTPE]i)|[numkMGTPE]|([eE](\+|-)?(([0-9]+(\.[0-9]*)?)|(\.[0-9]+))))?$
x-kubernetes-int-or-string: true
resource:
type: string
required:
- resource
type: object
x-kubernetes-map-type: atomic
secretKeyRef:
allOf:
- x-kubernetes-map-type: atomic
- x-kubernetes-map-type: atomic
properties:
key:
type: string
name:
type: string
optional:
type: boolean
required:
- key
type: object
type: object
required:
- name
type: object
type: array
x-kubernetes-list-map-keys:
- name
x-kubernetes-list-type: map Note the addition of allOf:
- x-kubernetes-map-type: atomic
- x-kubernetes-map-type: atomic to
It looks like the error is coming from here, but I'm not sure what it means. Any ideas? Thanks! |
Oh, it's so bad. That's what I worried when I commented #692 (comment) . It reminded me of another bug #688 , which generated duplicate |
@robbie-demuth could you please also share the go code which this is generated from? (at least the struct parts and markers for Edit: nevermind, I see that it is also present in the test data. I'll take a look at it 👍 sorry for the circumstances though 😞 |
Bug was introduced in kubernetes-sigs#693.
Bug was introduced in kubernetes-sigs#693.
This is an automated cherry-pick of #692
/assign alvaroaleman