Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 pkg/crd: support validating internal list items on list types #897

Closed

Conversation

AlexanderYastrebov
Copy link
Contributor

@AlexanderYastrebov AlexanderYastrebov commented Mar 26, 2024

For #342

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/invalid-commit-message Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid commit message. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Mar 26, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @AlexanderYastrebov!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/controller-tools 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/controller-tools has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Mar 26, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @AlexanderYastrebov. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AlexanderYastrebov
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign vincepri for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 26, 2024
For kubernetes-sigs#342

Signed-off-by: Alexander Yastrebov <alexander.yastrebov@zalando.de>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/invalid-commit-message Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid commit message. label Mar 26, 2024
// +kubebuilder:validation:MinLength=1
// +kubebuilder:validation:MaxLength=255
// +kubebuilder:validation:Pattern=^[a-z0-9]([-a-z0-9]*[a-z0-9])?([.][a-z0-9]([-a-z0-9]*[a-z0-9])?)*$
Hosts []string `json:"hosts,omitempty"`
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we have to find a way to differentiate if the validation is for the list as a whole or for the individual items in the list. This change just changes things to assume that its for the items. I don't think that is correct and its a breaking change

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think that is correct and its a breaking change

I don't think its a breaking change as previously these markers were rejected for slice types.
I also do not see a solid reason to introduce a new set of "items" markers as they will be mutually exclusive with those I change in this PR.

@AlexanderYastrebov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing in favour of #898

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants