-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 460
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add TLS support for crictl
exec
, portforward
and attach
#1668
Add TLS support for crictl
exec
, portforward
and attach
#1668
Conversation
a3faa62
to
9c8cb37
Compare
cmd/crictl/attach.go
Outdated
&cli.StringFlag{ | ||
Name: flagTLSServerName, | ||
Usage: "Server name used in the TLS client to check server certificates against", | ||
Aliases: []string{"tls-server", "tls-sn"}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should it be tls-sni
like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, changed as suggested and kept the tls-server-name
alias.
Add flags to allow using the TLS based streaming configuration. Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@redhat.com>
9c8cb37
to
2cf1580
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: saschagrunert, SergeyKanzhelev The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Add flags to allow using the TLS based streaming configuration.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
None
Special notes for your reviewer:
None
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?