Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add timeout option to CreateContainer, RunContainer, RunPodSandbox #666

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2020

Conversation

haircommander
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Add timeout option to CreateContainer, RunContainer, RunPodSandbox

This option allows users to test their CRI implementation with a timeout,
similarly to how the kubelet runs requests.

Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt pehunt@redhat.com

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Add `timeout` option to create, run, runp requests, allowing users to cancel CRI requests after a timeout

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Sep 24, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 24, 2020
@haircommander
Copy link
Contributor Author

haha @ the PR number 😈

Copy link
Member

@saschagrunert saschagrunert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally LGTM, just a suggestion around the type 👇

cmd/crictl/container.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
This option allows users to test their CRI implementation with a timeout,
similarly to how the kubelet runs requests.

Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <pehunt@redhat.com>
Copy link
Member

@saschagrunert saschagrunert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 24, 2020
Copy link
Member

@saschagrunert saschagrunert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: haircommander, saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 24, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 42f0514 into kubernetes-sigs:master Sep 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants