Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding 'affinity' support to run 'descheduler' in CronJob or Deployment #660

Conversation

martin-magakian
Copy link
Contributor

I want to add 'affinity' support in order to fine tune where 'descheduler' should run.

My current use case: I want to prefer "spot" instances over "ondemand" instances

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

CLA Not Signed

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 18, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @martin-magakian!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/descheduler 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/descheduler has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Nov 18, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @martin-magakian. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 18, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 18, 2021
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Nov 18, 2021

CLA Signed

The committers are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 18, 2021
@martin-magakian
Copy link
Contributor Author

signed

Copy link
Contributor

@damemi damemi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sounds reasonable to me, affinity provides more expressive functionality than nodeSelector which we already have.

@martin-magakian could you please link to the issue for this PR in your description? (#659) Adding Fixes #659 will auto-close the issue when this merges

@damemi
Copy link
Contributor

damemi commented Nov 18, 2021

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Nov 18, 2021
@ingvagabund
Copy link
Contributor

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good otherwise:

$ helm version
version.BuildInfo{Version:"v3.7.2", GitCommit:"663a896f4a815053445eec4153677ddc24a0a361", GitTreeState:"clean", GoVersion:"go1.16.10"}
$ helm install --dry-run --debug ./charts/descheduler --generate-name -f ./charts/descheduler/values.yaml:
...
# Source: descheduler/templates/deployment.yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: descheduler-1639752774
  labels:
    app.kubernetes.io/name: descheduler
    helm.sh/chart: descheduler-0.22.0
    app.kubernetes.io/instance: descheduler-1639752774
    app.kubernetes.io/version: "0.22.0"
    app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: Helm
spec:
  replicas: 1
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app.kubernetes.io/name: descheduler
      app.kubernetes.io/instance: descheduler-1639752774
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        app.kubernetes.io/name: descheduler
        app.kubernetes.io/instance: descheduler-1639752774
      annotations:
        checksum/config: 53d6ea8862d3b963e992a2024d5239a9afc09c446e8185ecd444196f04141aec
    spec:
      priorityClassName: system-cluster-critical
      serviceAccountName: descheduler-1639752774
      containers:
        - name: descheduler
          image: "k8s.gcr.io/descheduler/descheduler:v0.22.0"
          imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
          command:
            - "/bin/descheduler"
          args:
            - "--policy-config-file"
            - "/policy-dir/policy.yaml"
            - "--descheduling-interval"
            - 5m
            - "--v"
            - "3"
          ports:
            - containerPort: 10258
              protocol: TCP
          resources:
            requests:
              cpu: 500m
              memory: 256Mi
          securityContext:
            allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
            capabilities:
              drop:
                - ALL
            privileged: false
            readOnlyRootFilesystem: true
            runAsNonRoot: true
          volumeMounts:
            - mountPath: /policy-dir
              name: policy-volume
      volumes:
        - name: policy-volume
          configMap:
            name: descheduler-1639752774
      affinity:
        nodeAffinity:
          requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
            nodeSelectorTerms:
            - matchExpressions:
              - key: kubernetes.io/e2e-az-name
                operator: In
                values:
                - e2e-az1
                - e2e-az2

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 27, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ingvagabund, martin-magakian

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 27, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit afb1d75 into kubernetes-sigs:master Jan 27, 2022
briend pushed a commit to briend/descheduler that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2022
…add_affinity_option

Adding 'affinity' support to run 'descheduler' in CronJob or Deployment
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants