Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add strategy defaults and fix nodeFit for node affinity strategy #793

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

uniemimu
Copy link

@uniemimu uniemimu commented May 6, 2022

This adds defaults for strategies. Now each strategy may have
different default parameters, if some are omitted from the configmap.

Since the NodeFit parameter was a bool instead of a pointer, it
couldn't be detected whether it was being set in the configmap, or
not. Hence it is changed to a pointer. If it is not set in the
configmap, the default is taken.

Except for node affinity, all other strategies are now having a
default of false for an omitted NodeFit parameter, which matches
exactly how things have worked.

For the node affinity strategy, the legacy mode of operation has
always been what a "true" NodeFit would be. Thus an omitted NodeFit
parameter for that strategy is set to true, which matches how
node affinity has been working, effectively not evicting anything
if the pod doesn't fit into another node.

The change is in how things work when the NodeFit is explicitly set
to "false". The hard-coded check for pod fitting any node is removed,
and the NodeFit feature has control. NodeFit being false, node
affinity strategy will evict the pod regardless of whether there is
another node where it would fit.

Fixes #640

Signed-off-by: Ukri Niemimuukko ukri.niemimuukko@intel.com

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label May 6, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @uniemimu!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/descheduler 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/descheduler has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label May 6, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @uniemimu. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 6, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from damemi May 6, 2022 09:00
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please assign damemi after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @damemi in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@bart0sh: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/ok-to-test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@damemi damemi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 6, 2022
@uniemimu
Copy link
Author

uniemimu commented May 6, 2022

Nit for self, and for conversation: PodFitsAnyNode has no users anymore if this gets merged. Should it be removed at the same time?

pkg/utils/types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@uniemimu
Copy link
Author

uniemimu commented May 6, 2022

Squashed and cleaned. Sorry for the slipped in hacks in the intermediates.

@uniemimu uniemimu requested a review from damemi May 6, 2022 14:20
@damemi
Copy link
Contributor

damemi commented May 11, 2022

/retest

1 similar comment
@damemi
Copy link
Contributor

damemi commented May 12, 2022

/retest

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Contributor

@uniemimu thanks for keeping the defaulting in mind. As part of moving to the descheduling framework, this becomes part of the core changes in the code base after all plugins are migrated to plugins.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 16, 2022
This adds defaults for strategies. Now each strategy may have
different default parameters, if some are omitted from the configmap.

Since the NodeFit parameter was a bool instead of a pointer, it
couldn't be detected whether it was being set in the configmap, or
not. Hence it is changed to a pointer. If it is not set in the
configmap, the default is taken.

Except for node affinity, all other  strategies are now having a
default of false for an omitted NodeFit parameter, which matches
exactly how things have worked.

For the node affinity strategy, the legacy mode of operation has
always been what a "true" NodeFit would be. Thus an omitted NodeFit
parameter for that strategy is set to true, which matches how
node affinity has been working, effectively not evicting anything
if the pod doesn't fit into another node.

The change is in how things work when the NodeFit is explicitly set
to "false". The hard-coded check for pod fitting any node is removed,
and the NodeFit feature has control. NodeFit being false, node
affinity strategy will evict the pod regardless of whether there is
another node where it would fit.

Signed-off-by: Ukri Niemimuukko <ukri.niemimuukko@intel.com>

pkg/descheduler/strategies/nodeutilization/highnodeutilization.go
pkg/descheduler/strategies/nodeutilization/lownodeutilization.go
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 28, 2022
@uniemimu
Copy link
Author

@uniemimu thanks for keeping the defaulting in mind. As part of moving to the descheduling framework, this becomes part of the core changes in the code base after all plugins are migrated to plugins.

Ok please let me know if this is worth rebasing on top of some WIP PR which is considered better off going in first.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 4, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@uniemimu: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 3, 2022
@ingvagabund
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 7, 2022
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 12, 2023
@ingvagabund
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 13, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 11, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@uniemimu: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-descheduler-test-e2e-k8s-master-1-25 5d54ac1 link true /test pull-descheduler-test-e2e-k8s-master-1-25
pull-descheduler-test-e2e-k8s-master-1-26 5d54ac1 link true /test pull-descheduler-test-e2e-k8s-master-1-26
pull-descheduler-test-e2e-k8s-master-1-27 5d54ac1 link true /test pull-descheduler-test-e2e-k8s-master-1-27
pull-descheduler-test-e2e-k8s-master-1-28 5d54ac1 link true /test pull-descheduler-test-e2e-k8s-master-1-28
pull-descheduler-test-e2e-k8s-master-1-29 5d54ac1 link true /test pull-descheduler-test-e2e-k8s-master-1-29

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jan 20, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this PR with /reopen
  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this PR with /reopen
  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

nodeFit = false doesn't work as expected with RemovePodsViolatingNodeAffinity
5 participants