Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

correct JSON log format #993

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2022
Merged

Conversation

wakeful
Copy link
Contributor

@wakeful wakeful commented Oct 20, 2022

today I upgraded to 0.25.2 version and noticed that the json format is not working
after a quick scan of the code I noticed that factory is always nil.

some related problems #991 and #965

I'm sure there is a much more elegant solution to this problem.

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Oct 20, 2022

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: wakeful / name: AJ (1551242)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Oct 20, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @wakeful!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/descheduler 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/descheduler has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Oct 20, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @wakeful. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 20, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Oct 20, 2022
@ingvagabund
Copy link
Contributor

The last change in the formatting was performed in c9b0fbe. @wakeful would undoing the change help?

@wakeful
Copy link
Contributor Author

wakeful commented Oct 21, 2022

@ingvagabund I believe so but then the external dep upgrade will also be rollback,

-
-			factory, _ := registry.LogRegistry.Get(s.Logging.Format)
+			var factory registry.LogFormatFactory
 			if factory == nil {
 				klog.ClearLogger()

looking at the above patch I suspect the underlying API has change and the code was just adjusted to compile
as this project is lacking tests around flags it went unnoticed.

personally I think we should fix it without rollback / revert, add test(s) and push out a patch version

@damemi
Copy link
Contributor

damemi commented Oct 21, 2022

Thank you for finding this @wakeful

personally I think we should fix it without rollback / revert, add test(s) and push out a patch version

+1

Copy link
Contributor

@damemi damemi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Oct 21, 2022
@ingvagabund
Copy link
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 25, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ingvagabund

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 25, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 6481f1b into kubernetes-sigs:master Oct 25, 2022
@wakeful wakeful deleted the fix-json-log branch October 25, 2022 09:20
@damemi
Copy link
Contributor

damemi commented Oct 25, 2022

@ingvagabund wdyt about another patch release for this?

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Contributor

@wakeful is releasing a new descheduler version paramount for your business? Or, can you build the descheduler image from the latest master:HEAD and run in meantime?

@damemi unless there's a strong need for it, I prefer to wait until more fixes are merged.

@wakeful
Copy link
Contributor Author

wakeful commented Nov 6, 2022

hey @ingvagabund for now we are running a custom build from top of master :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants