-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 498
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spec unclear for scheme redirects in HTTPRoute #1909
Comments
It would be nice if we could get this sorted out before GA, since Could use some help from a community member to bring this up in discussions, tease this out and then get a patch to the documentation. /help |
@shaneutt: GuidelinesPlease ensure that the issue body includes answers to the following questions:
For more details on the requirements of such an issue, please see here and ensure that they are met. If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
I've already been involved with this so lets take it all the way. /assign |
I've put my thoughts in this doc. Will try to bring this up in some Gateway API meeting -- if time permits :) |
What happened:
As feedback in #1908, @howardjohn pointed out that it's currently unclear how scheme and port interact in the redirect filter. Two examples below:
A) https://example.com
B) https://example.com:80
A) https://example.com
B) https://example.com:80
A) https://example.com
B) https://example.com:8080
What you expected to happen:
The spec should tell implementations how to treat these scenarios.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: