Can HTTPRoute support global filters?

[machine3]

What would you like to be added:

Can HTTPRoute support global filters?

apiVersion: gateway.networking.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: HTTPRoute
metadata:
  name: myroute
spec:
  parentRefs:
    - name: mygw
  rules:
    - matches:
        - path:
            type: PathPrefix
            value: /test1
      backendRefs:
        - name: test1
          port: 8080
    - matches:
        - path:
            type: PathPrefix
            value: /test2
      backendRefs:
        - name: test2
          port: 8080
  filters:  # Generate efficiency for all rules
    - type: Cors
      cors:
        allowOriginRegex:
          - '^http(s)?:\/\/localhost:[0-9]{4,5}$'
        allowHeaders:
          - origin
          - content-type
        maxAge: 1d

Why this is needed:
For example, I want to add a cors filter under a HTTPRoute, which will take effect for all rules under the HTTPRoute.

[howardjohn]

IMO this type of syntax sugar is best handled by higher level tooling (helm, etc).

[machine3]

IMO this type of syntax sugar is best handled by higher level tooling (helm, etc).

@howardjohn What I described before may not be very accurate, I updated it, please help me to have a look

[howardjohn]

I think I understood it the first time and still have the same opinion here. Its not worth the complexity for the gain given the same benefits can be achieved via tooling on top, IMO.

[arkodg]

+1 to this change, since it improves UX, there are a set of filters that will most likely be common to the HTTPRoute such as CORS, RateLimiting, Mirroring (all under ExtensionRef today) and some that will be specific to a rule (RequestHeaderModifier, RequestRedirect etc)

[machine3]

I think I understood it the first time and still have the same opinion here. Its not worth the complexity for the gain given the same benefits can be achieved via tooling on top, IMO.

Although it is feasible for the upper layer to handle it, it would be better if the general capabilities of the api gateway can be achieved in the standard. Gloo edge has a similar function, they are called options cors, and from the usage scenarios, not only cors, such as ip black and white lists, etc., they The scope of effect is not just the dimension of routing rules. It is impossible for me to add an ip black and white list filter every time I create a routing rule. From the perspective of API, it is better to abstract out a lot of repeated definitions.

[hzxuzhonghu]

I think it makes sense to do it

[howardjohn]

IMO this is something where Policy Attachment makes sense, which already has the ability to insert at arbitrary points. I worry we are just re-inventing the same concept in two different ways. cc @youngnick

[youngnick]

This is one hundred percent an intended use for Policy Attachment, yes. Specifying a default Filter is a great use for an Inherited Policy.

[machine3]

You mean using Policy Attachmen, like this?

apiVersion: networking.example.io/v1alpha1
kind: FiltersPolicy
metadata:
  name: myroute-filters
spec:
  default:
    filters:
      - type: Cors
        cors:
          allowOriginRegex:
            - '^http(s)?:\/\/localhost:[0-9]{4,5}$'
          allowHeaders:
            - origin
            - content-type
          maxAge: 1d
  targetRef:
    name: myroute
    kind: HTTPRoute

@youngnick @howardjohn

[howardjohn]

Yes you could even do it at the entire Gateway level

[shaneutt]

If I'm reading the conversation here right it seems if there's any action to take its improving documentation (of policy attachment) so that it's better understood that this can and should be accomplished at that level, and to that end it seems reasonable to accept:

/kind gep
/kind documentation
/triage accepted

However as this doesn't seem like something we must resolve before GA, we would consider this a lower priority than GA requirements until v1.0.0 is released:

/priority backlog

[k8s-triage-robot]

This issue has not been updated in over 1 year, and should be re-triaged.

You can:

• Confirm that this issue is still relevant with /triage accepted (org members only)
• Close this issue with /close

For more details on the triage process, see https://www.kubernetes.dev/docs/guide/issue-triage/

/remove-triage accepted

[k8s-triage-robot]

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

• Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
• Close this issue with /close
• Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

[k8s-triage-robot]

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

• Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
• Close this issue with /close
• Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

[k8s-triage-robot]

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

• Reopen this issue with /reopen
• Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
• Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

[k8s-ci-robot]

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

• Reopen this issue with /reopen
• Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
• Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.