-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 491
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update signal error log #2361
update signal error log #2361
Conversation
Welcome @yylt! |
Hi @yylt. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Thanks @yylt! /ok-to-test |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: robscott, yylt The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Related to kubernetes/kubernetes#120168
Fix #2365
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
when gateway-api-webhook stop by sigterm signal in container, it always exit with -1 code. it will make error containerStatus
the log is here
IMO, when process exit, and there are some error happened, it should print with error level, not fatal level