Fixes 2779: Adds HAProxy Kubernetes Ingress Controller to Gateway API Implementations page.

[NickMRamirez]

What type of PR is this?

/kind documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #2779

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

-->

* DOCUMENTATION: Added HAProxy Kubernetes Ingress Controller to Gateway API Implementations page.

[linux-foundation-easycla]

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ login: sunjayBhatia / name: Sunjay Bhatia (a1de84e, 55a975d, 9f5e4cc)
• ✅ login: frankbu / name: Frank Budinsky (6172ca7)

[k8s-ci-robot]

Welcome @NickMRamirez!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/gateway-api 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/gateway-api has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: NickMRamirez
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign youngnick for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• site-src/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @NickMRamirez. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[k8s-ci-robot]

Keywords which can automatically close issues and at(@) mentions are not allowed in the title of a Pull Request.

You can edit the title by writing /retitle in a comment.

When GitHub merges a Pull Request, the title is included in the merge commit. To avoid invalid keywords in the merge commit, please edit the title of the PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[k8s-ci-robot]

Keywords which can automatically close issues and at(@) or hashtag(#) mentions are not allowed in commit messages.

The list of commits with invalid commit messages:

• f86f046 Fixes Add HAProxy Kubernetes Ingress Controller to Gateway API Implementation page #2779: Adds HAProxy Kubernetes Ingress Controller to Gateway API Implementation page.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[NickMRamirez]

Fixed commit mesage with git rebase.

[robscott]

Thanks @NickMRamirez! This PR LGTM, but you'll need to clean up the commits - maybe try squashing + rebasing to get this down to a single commit? Unfortunately the first commit still exists with the Fixes keyword which k8s-ci-robot doesn't allow.

Also have a higher level question - have you tried running conformance tests with your implementation yet?

[NickMRamirez]

I've never been too great at rebasing. It'll be simpler to start with a fresh PR. Closing this and created #2793