Support wide output format for get commands (-o wide)

[deszhou]

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #2889

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

1.Support wide output format for get commands (-o wide)
2.Replace `Print` in BackendsPrinter with `PrintTable`

cat <<EOF | kubectl apply -f -
apiVersion: gateway.networking.k8s.io/v1alpha2
kind: BackendTLSPolicy
metadata:
  name: enable-backend-tls
  namespace: default
spec:
  targetRef:
    group: ''
    kind: Service
    name: tls-backend
    sectionName: "443"
  tls:
    caCertRefs:
    - name: example-ca
      group: ''
      kind: ConfigMap
    hostname: www.example.com
EOF

• backend

➜  ✗ gwctl get backend       
NAMESPACE  NAME         TYPE     AGE
default    backend      Service  106d
default    kubernetes   Service  106d
default    tls-backend  Service  44h

➜  ✗ gwctl get backend -owide
NAMESPACE  NAME         TYPE     AGE   REFERRED BY ROUTES  POLICIES
default    backend      Service  106d  None                0
default    kubernetes   Service  106d  None                0
default    tls-backend  Service  44h   default/backend     1

• gatewayclass

➜  ✗ gwctl get gatewayclass       
NAME           CONTROLLER                                     ACCEPTED  AGE
eg             gateway.envoyproxy.io/gatewayclass-controller  True      104d
envoy-gateway  gateway.envoyproxy.io/gatewayclass-controller  True      95d

➜  ✗ gwctl get gatewayclass -owide
NAME           CONTROLLER                                     ACCEPTED  AGE   GATEWAYS
eg             gateway.envoyproxy.io/gatewayclass-controller  True      104d  1
envoy-gateway  gateway.envoyproxy.io/gatewayclass-controller  True      95d   0

• gateway

➜  ✗ gwctl get gateway      
NAMESPACE  NAME  CLASS  ADDRESSES       PORTS  PROGRAMMED  AGE
default    eg    eg     172.18.255.201  80     True        106d

➜  ✗ gwctl get gateway -owide
NAMESPACE  NAME  CLASS  ADDRESSES       PORTS  PROGRAMMED  AGE   POLICIES  HTTPROUTES
default    eg    eg     172.18.255.201  80     True        106d  0         1

• httproute

➜  ✗ gwctl get httproute
NAMESPACE  NAME     HOSTNAMES        PARENT REFS  AGE
default    backend  www.example.com  1            104d
➜  ✗ gwctl get httproute -owide
NAMESPACE  NAME     HOSTNAMES        PARENT REFS  AGE   POLICIES
default    backend  www.example.com  1            104d  0

• namespace

➜  ✗ gwctl get ns
NAME                  STATUS  AGE
default               Active  104d
envoy-gateway-system  Active  104d
kube-node-lease       Active  104d
kube-public           Active  104d
kube-system           Active  104d
local-path-storage    Active  104d
metallb-system        Active  95d
monitoring            Active  94d
➜  ✗ gwctl get ns -owide
NAME                  STATUS  AGE   POLICIES
default               Active  104d  0
envoy-gateway-system  Active  104d  0
kube-node-lease       Active  104d  0
kube-public           Active  104d  0
kube-system           Active  104d  0
local-path-storage    Active  104d  0
metallb-system        Active  95d   0
monitoring            Active  94d   0

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @yeedove. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[mlavacca]

This looks good to me, I left a minor comment 👍

/ok-to-test

[jongwooo]

The OutputFormatWIDE type is not currently handled by the switch statement below. Please add a case statement for OutputFormatWIDE type:

gateway-api/gwctl/pkg/printer/policies.go

Lines 88 to 96 in e50fd3b

	switch format {
	case utils.OutputFormatJSON, utils.OutputFormatYAML:
	pp.printClientObjects(clientObjects, format)
	case utils.OutputFormatTable:
	pp.printPoliciesTable(sortedPolicies)
	default:
	fmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, "unknown output format '%s' found\n", format)
	os.Exit(1)
	}

gateway-api/gwctl/pkg/printer/policies.go

Lines 129 to 137 in e50fd3b

	switch format {
	case utils.OutputFormatJSON, utils.OutputFormatYAML:
	pp.printClientObjects(clientObjects, format)
	case utils.OutputFormatTable:
	pp.printCRDsTable(sortedPolicyCRDs)
	default:
	fmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, "unknown output format '%s' found\n", format)
	os.Exit(1)
	}

[mlavacca]

Thanks, @yeedove

/lgtm

I'll let the approval to @gauravkghildiyal

[gauravkghildiyal]

Thanks @yeedove! This looks great, just have one minor request which should be quite straightforward.

[gauravkghildiyal]

I know this is a bit different from what's documented but I've come to realize that we should avoid any parameter from being displayed which needs additional calculations.

Calculating things like "REFERRED BY ROUTES" and "POLICIES" will take additional time (which becomes significant when there's lot's of resources). Hence it's preferrable to only include them in the -o wide format and not as a default.

tl;dr: Can you please move REFERRED BY ROUTES to wide format as well?

(In case you are wondering, we'll separately work on not calculating the additional values by default int the resourceModel -- as of now, that distinction doesn't exist`

[deszhou]

Of course, done!

[gauravkghildiyal]

Can you please also edit the release note and avoid the BackendsPrinter (to only focus on how the user experience is different)

[gauravkghildiyal]

/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gauravkghildiyal, yeedove

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• gwctl/OWNERS [gauravkghildiyal]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[gauravkghildiyal]

/lgtm