-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 491
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: add conformance suite client options #3343
chore: add conformance suite client options #3343
Conversation
pass options to the Kubernetes client
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, this should fix our issue I think. Appreciate the quick turnaround
@@ -234,6 +236,7 @@ func NewConformanceTestSuite(options ConformanceOptions) (*ConformanceTestSuite, | |||
|
|||
suite := &ConformanceTestSuite{ | |||
Client: options.Client, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there much point allowing someone to pass in a Client
anymore if its going to be ignored anyways?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a fair comment. It should be removed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would a follow up PR be suitable?
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: BobyMCbobs, howardjohn The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
What type of PR is this?
/kind test
/kind bug
/kind cleanup
/area conformance
What this PR does / why we need it:
pass options to the Kubernetes client to allow for things like schema and mapper.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #3342
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: