Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add unit tests to jobset success policy functions #501

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 11, 2024

Conversation

zhifei92
Copy link
Contributor

@zhifei92 zhifei92 commented Apr 9, 2024

my first pr

Add unit tests to jobset success policy functions

Fixes #491

Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Apr 9, 2024

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Apr 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @zhifei92!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/jobset 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/jobset has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Apr 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @zhifei92. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 9, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 9, 2024

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-jobset canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 28eeae1
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-jobset/deploys/661743b9ec431f00085c8161

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Apr 9, 2024
@zhifei92
Copy link
Contributor Author

zhifei92 commented Apr 9, 2024

/easycla

@googs1025
Copy link
Member

hi, Is this a duplicate pull request? #493

@danielvegamyhre
Copy link
Contributor

Please use table-driven format to test different scenarios for a given function. Example:

tests := []struct {
name string
startupPolicy *jobset.StartupPolicy
expected bool
}{
{
name: "startup policy AnyOrder",
startupPolicy: &jobset.StartupPolicy{StartupPolicyOrder: jobset.AnyOrder},
expected: false,
},
{
name: "startup policy InOrder",
startupPolicy: &jobset.StartupPolicy{StartupPolicyOrder: jobset.InOrder},
expected: true,
},
{
name: "nil startup policy",
startupPolicy: nil,
expected: false,
},
}

@zhifei92
Copy link
Contributor Author

zhifei92 commented Apr 9, 2024

Please use table-driven format to test different scenarios for a given function. Example:

tests := []struct {
name string
startupPolicy *jobset.StartupPolicy
expected bool
}{
{
name: "startup policy AnyOrder",
startupPolicy: &jobset.StartupPolicy{StartupPolicyOrder: jobset.AnyOrder},
expected: false,
},
{
name: "startup policy InOrder",
startupPolicy: &jobset.StartupPolicy{StartupPolicyOrder: jobset.InOrder},
expected: true,
},
{
name: "nil startup policy",
startupPolicy: nil,
expected: false,
},
}

get

@zhifei92
Copy link
Contributor Author

zhifei92 commented Apr 9, 2024

hi, Is this a duplicate pull request? #493

Sorry, I didn't notice

@zhifei92
Copy link
Contributor Author

zhifei92 commented Apr 10, 2024

/cc @danielvegamyhre @kannon92 hello, please help me review,thx

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Apr 10, 2024
@zhifei92
Copy link
Contributor Author

/easycla

@zhifei92
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dejanzele fix again,thank you

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Apr 10, 2024
@zhifei92 zhifei92 requested a review from dejanzele April 10, 2024 10:55
@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Apr 10, 2024
@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor

@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor

Once you address #501 (comment), LGTM.

/assign @danielvegamyhre

pkg/controllers/success_policy_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/controllers/success_policy_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/controllers/success_policy_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@zhifei92
Copy link
Contributor Author

@danielvegamyhre
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

Thanks for working on this!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 11, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: danielvegamyhre, zhifei92

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 11, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8732459 into kubernetes-sigs:main Apr 11, 2024
12 checks passed
@zhifei92 zhifei92 deleted the add-unit-test branch April 11, 2024 02:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add unit tests to jobset success policy functions
6 participants