Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix kind get clusters via nerdctl #3814

Merged

Conversation

kachick
Copy link
Contributor

@kachick kachick commented Dec 9, 2024

Fixes #3813

nerdctl fixed the .Label behavior in v1.7.0.
containerd/nerdctl#2619

However index .Labels syntax is not yet supported at least in v2.0.1.
(The style is also used for podman provider, and it is available)

This PR aims to follow up #3429

Now raising errors when using nerdctl for the provider

```console
> ./kind --version
kind version 0.26.0-alpha
> nerdctl --version
nerdctl version 2.0.1
> ./kind get clusters
ERROR: failed to list clusters: command "nerdctl ps -a --filter label=io.x-k8s.kind.cluster --format '{{index .Labels "io.x-k8s.kind.cluster"}}'" failed with error: exit status 1
Command Output: time="2024-12-09T18:01:03+09:00" level=fatal msg="template: :1:2: executing \"\" at <index .Labels \"io.x-k8s.kind.cluster\">: error calling index: cannot index slice/array with type string"
```

nerdctl fixed the `.Label` behavior in v1.7.0.
containerd/nerdctl@2af4cef
However `index .Labels` syntax is not yet supported at least in v2.0.1.
(The style is also used for podman provider, and it is available)

This commit follows up #3429

Signed-off-by: Kenichi Kamiya <kachick1@gmail.com>
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Dec 9, 2024

CLA Signed


The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Dec 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @kachick!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/kind 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/kind has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Dec 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @kachick. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Dec 9, 2024
@aojea
Copy link
Contributor

aojea commented Dec 9, 2024

/ok-to-test

@AkihiroSuda can you ping some nerdctl maintainers to check if this is correct?

Nevermind, I see the PR is yours, let me assign this to you

/assign @AkihiroSuda

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Dec 9, 2024
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ func (p *provider) ListClusters() ([]string, error) {
// filter for nodes with the cluster label
"--filter", "label="+clusterLabelKey,
// format to include the cluster name
"--format", fmt.Sprintf(`{{index .Labels "%s"}}`, clusterLabelKey),
"--format", fmt.Sprintf(`{{.Label "%s"}}`, clusterLabelKey),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we know if this ever worked? Do we need to version gate it? Or was it just copy-pasted from the docker provider and never worked?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably this was just copied without testing?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This kind of difference should be mentioned in code comment lines

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it seems podman also already implemented this containers/podman#20958

It is using the old format

// format to include the cluster name
"--format", fmt.Sprintf(`{{index .Labels "%s"}}`, clusterLabelKey),

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should check the docker driver and probably re-align this.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 18, 2024
@aojea
Copy link
Contributor

aojea commented Dec 18, 2024

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AkihiroSuda, aojea, kachick

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 18, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 1c5a56b into kubernetes-sigs:main Dec 18, 2024
30 checks passed
@kachick
Copy link
Contributor Author

kachick commented Dec 19, 2024

Thanks for reviewing and merging 🙏

@kachick kachick deleted the fix-get-clusters-via-nerdctl branch December 19, 2024 18:10
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

Thanks all!

@BenTheElder BenTheElder added this to the v0.27.0 milestone Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Listing clusters with nerdctl raises errors
5 participants