Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automate dependency upgrades with dependabot #644

Closed
corneliusweig opened this issue Sep 6, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Automate dependency upgrades with dependabot #644

corneliusweig opened this issue Sep 6, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels
lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.

Comments

@corneliusweig
Copy link
Contributor

Dependabot could automatically create PRs if some of our dependencies change. It doesn't work great with all dependencies, but it could at least alert us about new versions.
Some kubernetes subprojects seem to already use dependabot (some discussion: kubernetes/org#945).

So WDYT? Should we try it out?

@ahmetb
Copy link
Member

ahmetb commented Sep 9, 2020

It definitely makes a lot more sense on an org like kubernetes-clients where language-specific repos are maintained. I'm not sure if it helps a lot for our case. Our dependency list is pretty minimal, so it might become more of a hassle/noise than helpful, since our dependencies probably update way more frequently than we ship (e.g. once or twice a year based on current trends).

@corneliusweig
Copy link
Contributor Author

One of my goals is to make us aware of available updates. But you have a good point that it will create a disproportionate amount of noise, given our infrequent releases.

So what about that: we add an item to our release procedure that reminds us about bumping versions. That way we don't have the noise and still get reminded of that chore when it becomes relevant.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 18, 2020
@corneliusweig
Copy link
Contributor Author

I tried this out in another project and dependabot creates quite a lot of noise. For us it's probably not worth it.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@corneliusweig: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

I tried this out in another project and dependabot creates quite a lot of noise. For us it's probably not worth it.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants