Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draining during upgrades is not in parallel with mitogen #8125

Closed
fungusakafungus opened this issue Oct 25, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

Draining during upgrades is not in parallel with mitogen #8125

fungusakafungus opened this issue Oct 25, 2021 · 5 comments
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@fungusakafungus
Copy link
Contributor

Draining nodes is delegated to groups['kube_control_plane'][0] so even with the default serial: 20% it is subject to mitogen's caveat:

Actions are single-threaded for each (host, user account) combination, including actions that execute on the local machine. Playbooks may experience slowdown compared to vanilla Ansible if they employ long-running local_action or delegate_to tasks delegating many target hosts to a single machine and user account.

The picture we see is that kubespray will cordon a batch of nodes and will drain them slowly one after another, which massively slows down our upgrades.

Environment:

Kubespray version (commit) (git rev-parse --short HEAD):
2.17.0 with our patches

Network plugin used:
calico

Full inventory with variables (ansible -i inventory/sample/inventory.ini all -m debug -a "var=hostvars[inventory_hostname]"):

116 worker nodes

Command used to invoke ansible:
... upgrade-cluster.yml

Output of ansible run:

Anything else do we need to know:

@fungusakafungus fungusakafungus added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Oct 25, 2021
@cristicalin
Copy link
Contributor

kubectl commands are usually delegated to the first control plane node. Given that we have 3 of them this may be delegated to the group but I'm not sure it would actually delegate the action. An alternative would be to try to launch the commands in async mode (https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/user_guide/playbooks_async.html#asynchronous-playbook-tasks).

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 23, 2022
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Feb 22, 2022
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants