-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 276
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[docs] Generate API docs. #1263
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like the site generation failed, but it might be a fluke. Maybe amend or add a commit?
/lgtm |
@alculquicondor: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of website in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 19221adb58f7a85d75dd022548508d1cf94b1c78
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: alculquicondor, trasc The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@alculquicondor: new pull request created: #1280 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind documentation
What this PR does / why we need it:
Generate and publish API reference documentation for Kueue.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #1249
Special notes for your reviewer:
There is a PR
that will improve the output for map types.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?