Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for affinity matching #73

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2022

Conversation

ahg-g
Copy link
Contributor

@ahg-g ahg-g commented Feb 25, 2022

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Adds support for affinity matching with flavors

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #3

Special notes for your reviewer:

still need to add integration tests

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Feb 25, 2022
@ahg-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahg-g commented Feb 25, 2022

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 25, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ahg-g

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 25, 2022
pkg/capacity/capacity.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/capacity/capacity.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/scheduler/scheduler.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/scheduler/scheduler.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/scheduler/scheduler.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/scheduler/scheduler.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/scheduler/scheduler.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/scheduler/scheduler.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/scheduler/scheduler.go Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/scheduler/scheduler_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ahg-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahg-g commented Feb 28, 2022

/retest

@alculquicondor
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 28, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 28, 2022
@ahg-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahg-g commented Feb 28, 2022

squashed

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 28, 2022
@alculquicondor
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 28, 2022
@alculquicondor
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

2 similar comments
@ahg-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahg-g commented Mar 1, 2022

/retest

@ahg-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahg-g commented Mar 1, 2022

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 863efbd into kubernetes-sigs:main Mar 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Match workload affinity with capacity labels
4 participants