-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add spoc
, the Security Profiles Operator CLI
#1490
Conversation
42b10e4
to
f5d1b5f
Compare
We discussed in our last sync meeting that it would be helpful to have a slimmer SPO CLI for faster execution in edge scenarios. For that we would need a new binary, which can be used to directly interact with features like the ebpf recorder. Refers to kubernetes-sigs#1482 Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@redhat.com>
@kubernetes-sigs/security-profiles-operator-maintainers PTAL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I love the name!!
/lgtm cancel |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
How do you envision the workflow of using the CLI? Does one need to run the spoc container on the same host next to another container for which the recording is performed? Is additionally required the existing recorder container which communicates over gRCP with spoc container, or does it get merged into spoc CLI container?
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ccojocar, JAORMX, saschagrunert The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No, my main idea was to provide 2 distinct sets of functionality:
Means we can start with the first one and trying to integrate bpf recording of executables. Later on we can use the same binary for other features. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
We discussed in our last sync meeting that it would be helpful to have a slimmer SPO CLI for faster execution in edge scenarios. For that we would need a new binary, which can be used to directly interact with features like the ebpf recorder.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Refers to #1482
Does this PR have test?
None
Special notes for your reviewer:
None
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?