Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix kubeadm/kube-proxy source VIP usage #207

Closed

Conversation

ionutbalutoiu
Copy link
Contributor

PR Reason

The source VIP for the kubeadm/kube-proxy is not properly used.

PR Description

Remove IPv6DualStack feature gate. This is locked to true by default.

Proper kube-proxy VIP usage in kubeadm/kube-proxy manifest. Properly reserve the source VIP for kube-proxy to use.
This logic is already used in the hostprocess/flannel/kube-proxy manifest.
It was just ported to this kube-proxy daemonset, which is supposed to be used with legacy docker container runtime.

This is locked to `true` by default.
Properly reserve the source VIP for kube-proxy to use.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Feb 7, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @ionutbalutoiu!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/sig-windows-tools 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/sig-windows-tools has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ionutbalutoiu
To complete the pull request process, please assign marosset after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @marosset in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 7, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label Feb 7, 2022
Copy link
Member

@neolit123 neolit123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove IPv6DualStack feature gate. This is locked to true by default.

LGTM, on this change as the FG went GA.
(not sure about the rest)

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 8, 2022
@rudesome
Copy link
Contributor

@jsturtevant
Will this be merged anytime soon?

Getting the error on my 1.23 k8s
E0525 7944 run.go:120] "command failed" err="failed complete: cannot set feature gate IPv6DualStack to false, feature is locked to true"

@jsturtevant
Copy link
Contributor

The error E0525 7944 run.go:120] "command failed" err="failed complete: cannot set feature gate IPv6DualStack to false, feature is locked to true" is not related to this PR. Modify your kubeproxy configuration (in the yaml configuration file) to remove the IPv6DualStack flag to false. Better is to remove the flag as it has been completely removed in 1.25 (current active kubernetes branch).

@ionutbalutoiu
Copy link
Contributor Author

The error E0525 7944 run.go:120] "command failed" err="failed complete: cannot set feature gate IPv6DualStack to false, feature is locked to true" is not related to this PR. Modify your kubeproxy configuration (in the yaml configuration file) to remove the IPv6DualStack flag to false. Better is to remove the flag as it has been completely removed in 1.25 (current active kubernetes branch).

There is an extra commit to this PR that removes the feature flag: Remove IPv6DualStack feature gate

I can have a separate PR with it.

@ionutbalutoiu
Copy link
Contributor Author

The error E0525 7944 run.go:120] "command failed" err="failed complete: cannot set feature gate IPv6DualStack to false, feature is locked to true" is not related to this PR. Modify your kubeproxy configuration (in the yaml configuration file) to remove the IPv6DualStack flag to false. Better is to remove the flag as it has been completely removed in 1.25 (current active kubernetes branch).

There is an extra commit to this PR that removes the feature flag: Remove IPv6DualStack feature gate

I can have a separate PR with it.

This is it: #224

I'll rebase this PR after that gets merged.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jun 24, 2022
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants