-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ensure that securityContext can be set in Helm chart #130
Merged
k8s-ci-robot
merged 1 commit into
kubernetes-sigs:master
from
aiyengar2:fix_security_context
Oct 2, 2023
Merged
Ensure that securityContext can be set in Helm chart #130
k8s-ci-robot
merged 1 commit into
kubernetes-sigs:master
from
aiyengar2:fix_security_context
Oct 2, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
According to the Kubernetes API reference docs, `podSecurityContext` should correspond to `spec.template.spec.securityContext`. I'm assuming that the intention of exposing `securityContext` here was to target the `[container]securityContext` of the main container, which should be `spec.template.spec.containers[0].securityContext`. However, since in the current implementation the `securityContext` and `podSecurityContext` are indented to the same line, one simply overrides the other. So you see this outcome, where the `securityContext` **overrides** the `podSecurityContext` **at a Pod level**: ```bash $ helm template --set="securityContext.hi=bye" --set="podSecurityContext.hi=windows" gmsa charts/gmsa | yq e 'select(.kind == "Deployment") | {"podSecurityContext": .spec.template.spec.securityContext, "containerSecurityContext": .spec.template.spec.containers[0].securityContext}' podSecurityContext: hi: bye containerSecurityContext: null ``` To fix this, this commit modifies the indentation to get the correct output. Here is the same command (and a couple of more tests) of the same thing: ```bash $ helm template gmsa charts/gmsa | yq e 'select(.kind == "Deployment") | {"podSecurityContext": .spec.template.spec.securityContext, "containerSecurityContexts": .spec.template.spec.containers[0].securityContext}' podSecurityContext: null containerSecurityContexts: null $ helm template --set="securityContext.hi=bye" gmsa charts/gmsa | yq e 'select(.kind == "Deployment") | {"podSecurityContext": .spec.template.spec.securityContext, "containerSecurityContext": .spec.template.spec.containers[0].securityContext}' podSecurityContext: null containerSecurityContext: hi: bye $ helm template --set="podSecurityContext.hi=windows" gmsa charts/gmsa | yq e 'select(.kind == "Deployment") | {"podSecurityContext": .spec.template.spec.securityContext, "containerSecurityContext": .spec.template.spec.containers[0].securityContext}' podSecurityContext: hi: windows containerSecurityContext: null $ helm template --set="securityContext.hi=bye" --set="podSecurityContext.hi=windows" gmsa charts/gmsa | yq e 'select(.kind == "Deployment") | {"podSecurityContext": .spec.template.spec.securityContext, "containerSecurityContext": .spec.template.spec.containers[0].securityContext}' podSecurityContext: hi: windows containerSecurityContext: hi: bye ```
k8s-ci-robot
added
sig/windows
Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Windows.
cncf-cla: yes
Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA.
size/XS
Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
labels
Sep 29, 2023
nice catch! |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: aiyengar2, jsturtevant The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
approved
Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.
label
Sep 29, 2023
/lgtm |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
"Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
label
Oct 2, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
approved
Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.
cncf-cla: yes
Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA.
lgtm
"Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
sig/windows
Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Windows.
size/XS
Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#131
According to the Kubernetes API reference docs,
podSecurityContext
should correspond tospec.template.spec.securityContext
.I'm assuming that the intention of exposing
securityContext
here was to target the[container]securityContext
of the main container, which should bespec.template.spec.containers[0].securityContext
.However, since in the current implementation the
securityContext
andpodSecurityContext
are indented to the same line, one simply overrides the other. So you see this outcome, where thesecurityContext
overrides thepodSecurityContext
at a Pod level:To fix this, this commit modifies the indentation to get the correct output. Here is the same command (and a couple of more tests) of the same thing: