SIG-scalability charter.

[wasylkowski-a]

This is a copy of @porridge's PR #1607. @porridge will no longer be working on that PR, so I am taking it over with his consent.

SIG-scalability leads:
/cc @wojtek-t @countspongebob
Steering committee representatives:
/cc @thockin @smarterclayton @spiffxp

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wasylkowski-a
To fully approve this pull request, please assign additional approvers.
We suggest the following additional approver: countspongebob

Assign the PR to them by writing /assign @countspongebob in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• sig-scalability/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[cblecker]

/ok-to-test

[countspongebob]

Content of the charter is good, but per some other comments from steering we need to address some basic governance issues like SIG leads. I'd like to see us approve this as it is the substantive content and do another PR to address remaining gaps.

[shyamjvs]

Thanks @wasylkowski-a!

+1 to @countspongebob's comment on addressing gaps in a later PR.

[wojtek-t]

Content of the charter is good, but per some other comments from steering we need to address some basic governance issues like SIG leads. I'd like to see us approve this as it is the substantive content and do another PR to address remaining gaps.

I'm fine with that, but let's add explicit TODOs to the charter to address the issues mentioned in the original PR.

[countspongebob]

I will review the two SIG templates (there is a short one and a long one) and propose inclusion into the charter. Would you be ok with a single to-do that covers review of inclusion of the template with all of the relevant items?

[wojtek-t]

Would you be ok with a single to-do that covers review of inclusion of the template with all of the relevant items?

I think that we need a TODO that will describe all the missing parts in the charter. If we mention all the missing things, I'm fine with that.

[wasylkowski-a]

I will do that as soon as I get some uninterrupted time; hopefully this week. Stay tuned.

[hongchaodeng]

https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/blob/master/testgrid/config/config.yaml

This page is "not found" :)
Can you fix it?

[hongchaodeng]

These are really good points.
One suggestion: put them in the first section to justify the proposal

[timothysc]

I think this needs to be handled with care to ensure folks are informed of the tradeoff's associated with a revert. kubernetes/kubernetes#60891 (comment) is a good example that blindly reverting without conversing it through can be dangerous.

[spiffxp]

Same questions as in the previous PR

• what are the responsibilities of your SIG leads?
• what process do you use to change SIG leadership?
• what code do you own?

See https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/committee-steering/governance/sig-governance-requirements.md for the checklist we use to evaluate charters

[k8s-ci-robot]

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.

---

• If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
• If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please sign in with your organization's credentials at https://identity.linuxfoundation.org/projects/cncf to be authorized.
• If you have done the above and are still having issues with the CLA being reported as unsigned, please email the CNCF helpdesk: helpdesk@rt.linuxfoundation.org

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[wojtek-t]

I'm going to rewrite it to more match the style SIG Architecture recommend for writing charters.

So I'm closing this one and will hopefully open a new one within the next 2 weeks.

[wojtek-t]

@wasylkowski-a - I don't have persmissions to close this one, so please close :)

[cblecker]

@wojtek-t you should be able to close with the /close command :)

[wojtek-t]

/close

[wojtek-t]

I've opened #2149 as a replacement.