Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

KEP Issue: Object Storage API #1593

Closed
copejon opened this issue Mar 4, 2020 · 10 comments
Closed

KEP Issue: Object Storage API #1593

copejon opened this issue Mar 4, 2020 · 10 comments
Labels
sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage.

Comments

@copejon
Copy link

copejon commented Mar 4, 2020

Object Storage API

  • An API for managing object store buckets/containers via CRDs and controllers modeled after CSI's central controller and sidecars and communicating to drivers via gRPC.
  • Pull Request: object bucket provisioning #1383
  • Primary contact (assignee):

@copejon
@jeffvance

  • Responsible SIGs: sig-storage

  • Enhancement target (which target equals to which milestone):
    TBD, pending initial concept acceptance

    • Alpha release target (x.y)
    • Beta release target (x.y)
    • Stable release target (x.y)
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Mar 4, 2020
@copejon
Copy link
Author

copejon commented Mar 4, 2020

/sig storage

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@copejon: The label(s) sig/sig-storage cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them

In response to this:

/sig sig-storage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 4, 2020
@harshanarayana
Copy link

Hey there @copejon / @jeffvance -- 1.19 Enhancements shadow here. I wanted to check in and see if you think this Enhancement will be graduating in 1.19?

In order to have this part of the release:

  1. The KEP PR must be merged in an implementable state
  2. The KEP must have test plans
  3. The KEP must have graduation criteria.

The current release schedule is:

  • Monday, April 13: Week 1 - Release cycle begins
  • Tuesday, May 19: Week 6 - Enhancements Freeze
  • Thursday, June 25: Week 11 - Code Freeze
  • Thursday, July 9: Week 14 - Docs must be completed and reviewed
  • Tuesday, August 4: Week 17 - Kubernetes v1.19.0 released

If you do, I'll add it to the 1.19 tracking sheet (http://bit.ly/k8s-1-19-enhancements). Once coding begins please list all relevant k/k PRs in this issue so they can be tracked properly. 👍

Thanks!

@copejon
Copy link
Author

copejon commented May 1, 2020

Hi @harshanarayana. I don't anticipate having code finalized by the freeze date.

@harshanarayana
Copy link

Thanks @copejon for following up with an update on this issue. I have updated the tracker accordingly.

In case if you are planning to pick this up in one of the upcoming releases, please do let me know so that I can update the tracker accordinly to reflect the same.

Thanks

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 30, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Aug 29, 2020
@palnabarun
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Sep 1, 2020
@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Member

I believe this will be closed in favor of #1979 but I will allow @xing-yang to update here first and then update the tracking sheet

@xing-yang
Copy link
Contributor

I'm closing this one. Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants