-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
KEP Issue: Object Storage API #1593
Comments
/sig storage |
@copejon: The label(s) In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Hey there @copejon / @jeffvance -- 1.19 Enhancements shadow here. I wanted to check in and see if you think this Enhancement will be graduating in 1.19? In order to have this part of the release:
The current release schedule is:
If you do, I'll add it to the 1.19 tracking sheet (http://bit.ly/k8s-1-19-enhancements). Once coding begins please list all relevant k/k PRs in this issue so they can be tracked properly. 👍 Thanks! |
Hi @harshanarayana. I don't anticipate having code finalized by the freeze date. |
Thanks @copejon for following up with an update on this issue. I have updated the tracker accordingly. In case if you are planning to pick this up in one of the upcoming releases, please do let me know so that I can update the tracker accordinly to reflect the same. Thanks |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
I believe this will be closed in favor of #1979 but I will allow @xing-yang to update here first and then update the tracking sheet |
I'm closing this one. Thanks. |
Object Storage API
@copejon
@jeffvance
Responsible SIGs: sig-storage
Enhancement target (which target equals to which milestone):
TBD, pending initial concept acceptance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: