Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CSI Drivers in Windows as HostProcess Pods #3636

Open
7 tasks
mauriciopoppe opened this issue Oct 24, 2022 · 16 comments
Open
7 tasks

CSI Drivers in Windows as HostProcess Pods #3636

mauriciopoppe opened this issue Oct 24, 2022 · 16 comments
Labels
sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. sig/windows Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Windows.

Comments

@mauriciopoppe
Copy link
Member

mauriciopoppe commented Oct 24, 2022

Enhancement Description

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Oct 24, 2022
@mauriciopoppe
Copy link
Member Author

/sig storage

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 24, 2022
@mauriciopoppe mauriciopoppe changed the title Running the Windows node component of a CSI Driver as a HostProcess Pod CSI Drivers in Windows as a HostProcess Pod Oct 24, 2022
@mauriciopoppe mauriciopoppe changed the title CSI Drivers in Windows as a HostProcess Pod CSI Drivers in Windows as HostProcess Pods Oct 24, 2022
@mauriciopoppe
Copy link
Member Author

/sig windows

@marosset
Copy link
Contributor

marosset commented Nov 2, 2022

/cc

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 31, 2023
@alexander-ding
Copy link

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Feb 2, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 3, 2023
@mauriciopoppe
Copy link
Member Author

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 4, 2023
@jayunit100
Copy link
Member

what ever happened to this one?

@mauriciopoppe
Copy link
Member Author

hey @jayunit100, I captured the current state of the integration at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_WtQUnnlXE_M-YzYVrPZbjEgSxMvY9EYFwl61MC2i5I/edit#bookmark=id.ww7xe8kiazif.

From a development point of view I think we're done (thanks to @alexander-ding), there were a few problems about the integration with GKE:

  • security: GKE autopilot and the privilege level of the DaemonSet
  • node skew: on k8s upgrades we bump the control plane components first including DaemonSets, a concern we had is that we could end up in an scenario where the CP is upgraded to 1.X and the new DaemonSet deployed but the nodes are still 1.X-2. This was a problem before because the kubelet would be too old, I think that now if the scenario is CP 1.27, nodepools 1.25 then it works so this problem is not there anymore.

The node skew scenario is no longer a problem, the security scenario is a problem specific to GKE but I believe any CSI Driver which makes the component privileged would have this problem, I think I need to expand more on the suggestions.

Another problem is defining the graduation criteria, devs from AWS were trying to integrate this work, I think Azuredisk is already running the CSI Driver as a privileged container but without using the new version of CSI Proxy. Having more CSI Drivers using the library would help me define the graduation criteria e.g. "Graduation Criteria: At least 2 CSI Drivers are using the new version of CSI Proxy".

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 26, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Feb 25, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue with /reopen
  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 26, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue with /reopen
  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@mauriciopoppe
Copy link
Member Author

/reopen

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@mauriciopoppe: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Oct 17, 2024
@mauriciopoppe
Copy link
Member Author

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Oct 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. sig/windows Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Windows.
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants