Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add support for online resizing of PVs #531

Closed
mlmhl opened this issue Dec 20, 2017 · 88 comments
Closed

Add support for online resizing of PVs #531

mlmhl opened this issue Dec 20, 2017 · 88 comments
Assignees
@mlmhl
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. stage/beta Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Beta status tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team

Comments

@mlmhl
Copy link

mlmhl commented Dec 20, 2017 •
edited by kacole2
Loading

Feature Description

  • Allow PVs to be resized without having to terminate pods and unmount volume first.
  • Primary contact (assignee): @mlmhl
  • Responsible SIGs: @kubernetes/sig-storage-feature-requests
  • Design proposal link (community repo): kubernetes/community#1535
  • KEP: 20190125-online-growing-persistent-volume-size
  • Link to e2e and/or unit tests:
  • Reviewer(s) - (for LGTM) recommend having 2+ reviewers: @saad-ali @gnufied
  • Approver (likely from SIG/area to which feature belongs): @jsafrane
  • Feature target (which target equals to which milestone):
    • Alpha release target (x.y): 1.11
    • Beta release target (x.y): 1.15
    • Stable release target (x.y): 1.xx
@mlmhl
Copy link
Author

mlmhl commented Dec 20, 2017

This is a sub feature of this feature.

@idvoretskyi
Copy link
Member

/assign @mlmhl

@idvoretskyi idvoretskyi added the stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status label Jan 22, 2018
@idvoretskyi
Copy link
Member

/sig storage

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. label Jan 22, 2018
@idvoretskyi idvoretskyi added this to the v1.10 milestone Jan 22, 2018
@idvoretskyi idvoretskyi added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team labels Jan 29, 2018
@Bradamant3
Copy link
Contributor

@mlmhl doc PR, please? also please update the 1.10 feature tracking spreadsheet
It looks as though there are several related features going into this release; I'm tracking them for docs purposes per the spreadsheet. lmk if something else would work better. Also if one doc PR covers multiple issues, if you tag the issues in the doc PR, that will help. Thanks!

@Bradamant3
Copy link
Contributor

@mlmhl docs ping ^^
/cc @idvoretskyi

@gnufied
Copy link
Member

gnufied commented Mar 6, 2018

This feature did make make into 1.10 milestone. Please drop this from the list.

@Bradamant3 Bradamant3 modified the milestones: v1.10, next-milestone, v1.11 Mar 7, 2018
@mlmhl mlmhl mentioned this issue Apr 12, 2018
Merged
@saad-ali saad-ali modified the milestones: next-milestone, v1.11 Apr 12, 2018
@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

@mlmhl @gnufied
Any plans for this in 1.11?

If so, can you please ensure the feature is up-to-date with the appropriate:

  • Description
  • Milestone
  • Assignee(s)
  • Labels:
    • stage/{alpha,beta,stable}
    • sig/*
    • kind/feature

cc @idvoretskyi

@mlmhl
Copy link
Author

mlmhl commented Apr 17, 2018

@justaugustus Yeah, we are working on this feature now, the doc PR and code PR are both posted.
The Milestone and Labels are already updated, are these correct?

@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

@mlmhl looks good. Just wanted to confirm before committing this to the 1.11 Features list. Thanks again!

@mdlinville
Copy link

@mlmhl please fill out the appropriate line item of the
1.11 feature tracking spreadsheet
and open a placeholder docs PR against the
release-1.11 branch
by 5/25/2018 (tomorrow as I write this) if new docs or docs changes are
needed and a relevant PR has not yet been opened.

@mlmhl
Copy link
Author

mlmhl commented May 25, 2018

@mistyhacks done.

@yogi-sagar yogi-sagar mentioned this issue May 25, 2018
Closed
@mdlinville
Copy link

Thanks for marking that it needs docs. I was not able to find the placeholder PR in order to put it in the 1.11 milestone. Can you point me to it?

k8s-github-robot pushed a commit to kubernetes/kubernetes that referenced this issue May 31, 2018
Merge pull request #62460 from mlmhl/volume-online-resize
7303776 
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 62460, 64480, 63774, 64540, 64337). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.

Implement kubelet side online file system resize for volume

**What this PR does / why we need it**:

Implement kubelet side online file system resize.

xref - [kubernetes/feature#531](kubernetes/enhancements#531)
proposal - [kubernetes/community#1535](kubernetes/community#1535)

**Release note**:

```release-note
Implement kubelet side online file system resizing
```
@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

@mlmhl -- this feature has been moved to the Milestone risks sheet within the 1.11 Features tracking spreadsheet.

Please update the line item for this feature on the Milestone risks sheet ASAP AND ping myself and @idvoretskyi, so we can assess the feature status or we will need to officially remove it from the milestone.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@gnufied
Copy link
Member

gnufied commented Feb 25, 2021

/reopen
/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@gnufied: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

/reopen
/remove-lifecycle rotten

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Feb 25, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Feb 25, 2021
@gnufied
Copy link
Member

gnufied commented Feb 25, 2021

We are still actively working on fixing bugs and improving this feature, so as it can reach GA milestone.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 26, 2021
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jun 25, 2021
@gnufied
Copy link
Member

gnufied commented Jun 25, 2021

We are still working on this.
/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Jun 25, 2021
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 23, 2021
@gnufied
Copy link
Member

gnufied commented Sep 23, 2021

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Oct 23, 2021
@jsafrane
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@gnufied
Copy link
Member

gnufied commented Nov 24, 2021

/reopen

@gnufied
Copy link
Member

gnufied commented Nov 24, 2021

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Nov 24, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@gnufied: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mlmhl mlmhl

Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. stage/beta Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Beta status tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests