Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Resource API Proposal #607

Closed
jiayingz opened this issue Jul 31, 2018 · 15 comments
Closed

New Resource API Proposal #607

jiayingz opened this issue Jul 31, 2018 · 15 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team

Comments

@jiayingz
Copy link

jiayingz commented Jul 31, 2018

Feature Description

  • One-line feature description (can be used as a release note): A new resource API model to support non-native compute resources with rich set of resource properties.
  • Primary contact (assignee): @vikaschoudhary16 @jiayingz
  • Responsible SIGs: @kubernetes/sig-node-feature-requests @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-feature-requests
  • Design proposal link (community repo): KEP: New Resource API proposal community#2265
  • Link to e2e and/or unit tests:
  • Reviewer(s) - (for LGTM) recommend having 2+ reviewers (at least one from code-area OWNERS file) agreed to review. Reviewers from multiple companies preferred: @derekwaynecarr @dchen1107 @bsalamat @vishh @MaciekPytel
  • Approver (likely from SIG/area to which feature belongs): @derekwaynecarr @dchen1107 @bsalamat @thockin
  • Feature target (which target equals to which milestone):
    • Alpha release target (1.12)
    • Beta release target (TBD)
    • Stable release target (TBD)
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. labels Jul 31, 2018
@jiayingz
Copy link
Author

/stage alpha

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status label Jul 31, 2018
@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

Added to the 1.12 tracking sheet.
/assign @vikaschoudhary16 @jiayingz

@justaugustus justaugustus added this to the v1.12 milestone Jul 31, 2018
@justaugustus justaugustus added the tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team label Jul 31, 2018
@vishh
Copy link
Contributor

vishh commented Jul 31, 2018

Is this feature already confirmed to go alpha in v1.12 or is v1.12 just an estimate for now?

@jiayingz
Copy link
Author

It is an estimate target.

@derekwaynecarr
Copy link
Member

i think the target is a design that meets the community need, i think an implementation is a stretch goal.

@MaciekPytel
Copy link

Can we add a reviewer from sig-autoscaling? This will have a large impact on cluster autoscaling.

@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

@vikaschoudhary16 @jiayingz @derekwaynecarr -- checking in again... any plans for this in 1.12?

@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

@vikaschoudhary16 @jiayingz @derekwaynecarr --
Any update on docs status for this feature? Are we still planning to land it for 1.12?
At this point, code freeze is upon us, and docs are due on 9/7 (2 days).
If we don't here anything back regarding this feature ASAP, we'll need to remove it from the milestone.

cc: @zparnold @jimangel @tfogo

@jiayingz
Copy link
Author

jiayingz commented Sep 5, 2018

Lets remove it from 1.12 milestone.

@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the update!
/milestone clear

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed this from the v1.12 milestone Sep 6, 2018
@justaugustus justaugustus removed the tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team label Sep 6, 2018
@kacole2
Copy link

kacole2 commented Oct 8, 2018

Hi
This enhancement has been tracked before, so we'd like to check in and see if there are any plans for this to graduate stages in Kubernetes 1.13. This release is targeted to be more ‘stable’ and will have an aggressive timeline. Please only include this enhancement if there is a high level of confidence it will meet the following deadlines:
Docs (open placeholder PRs): 11/8
Code Slush: 11/9
Code Freeze Begins: 11/15
Docs Complete and Reviewed: 11/27

Please take a moment to update the milestones on your original post for future tracking and ping @kacole2 so it can be included in the 1.13 Enhancements Tracking Sheet

All PRs for features have relevant release notes included as well.

Thanks!

@kacole2 kacole2 added the tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team label Oct 8, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 6, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Feb 5, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants