-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
KEP-1435: adding PRR for MixedProtocolLBService feature to move to beta #3196
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM for content, but I am not PRR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall +1 from me, shifting the validation for protocols out of apiserver validation and into provider-specific implementations makes sense.
There's a future optimization we can also propose in the future, where instead of defering to cloud provider controllers to validation protocols, they can run external validation webhooks against Service. We might even be able to re-use work from this KEP https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-cloud-provider/2699-add-webhook-hosting-to-ccm
997da7e
to
db2433c
Compare
/lgtm |
db2433c
to
0c97a6d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
/lgtm
/approve
@aojea thanks for your replies, please update the KEP/PRR questionnaire with these answers |
Signed-off-by: Bridget Kromhout <bridget@kromhout.org>
0c97a6d
to
98180d2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome, thank you!
/lgtm
/approve
for PRR
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bridgetkromhout, ehashman, thockin The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Thanks Elana 👏 |
Adding Production Readiness Review for Mixed Protocols in Services with type=LoadBalancer
Issue link: Support of mixed protocols in Services with type=LoadBalancer #1435
Other comments:
Have discussed with SIG-network and SIG-cloudprovider; see #1435 (comment) for details.
Signed-off-by: Bridget Kromhout bridget@kromhout.org