Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

KEP-1435: adding PRR for MixedProtocolLBService feature to move to beta #3196

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2022

Conversation

bridgetkromhout
Copy link
Member

@bridgetkromhout bridgetkromhout commented Jan 27, 2022

  • One-line PR description:

Adding Production Readiness Review for Mixed Protocols in Services with type=LoadBalancer

Have discussed with SIG-network and SIG-cloudprovider; see #1435 (comment) for details.

Signed-off-by: Bridget Kromhout bridget@kromhout.org

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 27, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. labels Jan 27, 2022
Copy link
Member

@thockin thockin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM for content, but I am not PRR.

Copy link
Member

@andrewsykim andrewsykim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall +1 from me, shifting the validation for protocols out of apiserver validation and into provider-specific implementations makes sense.

There's a future optimization we can also propose in the future, where instead of defering to cloud provider controllers to validation protocols, they can run external validation webhooks against Service. We might even be able to re-use work from this KEP https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-cloud-provider/2699-add-webhook-hosting-to-ccm

keps/sig-network/1435-mixed-protocol-lb/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@bridgetkromhout
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @thockin @ehashman

@thockin
Copy link
Member

thockin commented Jan 29, 2022

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 29, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 31, 2022
Copy link
Member

@thockin thockin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 31, 2022
@ehashman
Copy link
Member

ehashman commented Feb 1, 2022

@aojea thanks for your replies, please update the KEP/PRR questionnaire with these answers

Signed-off-by: Bridget Kromhout <bridget@kromhout.org>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 1, 2022
@bridgetkromhout
Copy link
Member Author

@aojea thanks for your replies, please update the KEP/PRR questionnaire with these answers

Thanks, @ehashman! I've incorporated the feedback from you and @aojea into my latest update; please review and let us know what additional edits (if any) are needed.

Copy link
Member

@ehashman ehashman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome, thank you!

/lgtm
/approve
for PRR

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 1, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bridgetkromhout, ehashman, thockin

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 1, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit be1770b into kubernetes:master Feb 1, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.24 milestone Feb 1, 2022
@aojea
Copy link
Member

aojea commented Feb 1, 2022

Awesome, thank you!

/lgtm /approve for PRR

Thanks Elana 👏

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants