Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor terraformWriter.Literal #14680

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 28, 2022

Conversation

johngmyers
Copy link
Member

@johngmyers johngmyers commented Nov 27, 2022

This is probably best reviewed commit-by-commit.

Moves logic for Literal into the constructors.

/assign @rifelpet

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 27, 2022
@johngmyers johngmyers changed the title Refactor terraformWriter.Literal WIP Refactor terraformWriter.Literal Nov 27, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 27, 2022
@johngmyers johngmyers changed the title WIP Refactor terraformWriter.Literal Refactor terraformWriter.Literal Nov 27, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 27, 2022
"source": "\"${path.module}/data/google_storage_bucket_object_bar_content\""
}
`,
expectedACLJSON: `
{
"bucket": "foo",
"object": "${google_storage_bucket_object.bar.output_name}",
"provider": "${google.files}",
"object": "google_storage_bucket_object.bar.output_name",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this needs to be:

Suggested change
"object": "google_storage_bucket_object.bar.output_name",
"object": "${google_storage_bucket_object.bar.output_name}",

but I'm not sure if that's just a side effect of how we're using json for unit tests

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's just a side effect of how JSON is being used for unit tests. JSON is only being used for unit tests at this point, so the "expected" value is arbitrary.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 28, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rifelpet

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 28, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 545931f into kubernetes:master Nov 28, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.26 milestone Nov 28, 2022
@johngmyers johngmyers deleted the literal-refactor branch November 28, 2022 02:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants