-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add federation api and cm servers to hyperkube #27586
Add federation api and cm servers to hyperkube #27586
Conversation
Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). 📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign. Once you've signed, please reply here (e.g.
|
Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test". This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry. Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy. |
3 similar comments
Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test". This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry. Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy. |
Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test". This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry. Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy. |
Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test". This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry. Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy. |
bd40bb1
to
8b2d1f3
Compare
CLAs look good, thanks! |
@quinton-hoole @nikhiljindal Is this one for v1.3? |
@luxas given that federation is a blocker, I would think exposing federation binaries via hyperkube is mandatory functionality for v1.3. |
@mikedanese @ixdy @lavalamp Someone that may trigger the tests? |
add to whitelist |
My apologies, I overlooked this PR. Sorting it out now. |
ok to test |
Verification failures do not seem related to this PR: Verifying ./hack/../hack/verify-govet.sh
federation/pkg/dnsprovider/providers/aws/route53/testing/route53api.go:79: arg change.ResourceRecordSet.Name for printf verb %s of wrong type: *string
federation/pkg/dnsprovider/providers/aws/route53/testing/route53api.go:84: arg change.ResourceRecordSet.Name for printf verb %s of wrong type: *string
federation/pkg/dnsprovider/providers/aws/route53/testing/route53api.go:105: arg input.Name for printf verb %s of wrong type: *string
federation/pkg/dnsprovider/providers/google/clouddns/clouddns.go:110: k8s.io/kubernetes/federation/pkg/dnsprovider/providers/google/clouddns/internal/stubs.ManagedZone composite literal uses unkeyed fields
FAILED ./hack/../hack/verify-govet.sh 342s
....
Verifying ./hack/../hack/verify-symbols.sh
Go version: go version go1.6.2 linux/amd64
+++ [0617 13:06:17] Building the toolchain targets:
k8s.io/kubernetes/hack/cmd/teststale
+++ [0617 13:06:18] Building go targets for linux/amd64:
cmd/hyperkube
+++ [0617 13:07:01] Placing binaries
Found bad symbol 'testing[.]':
00000000042371c0 r go.importpath.k8s.io/kubernetes/federation/pkg/dnsprovider/providers/aws/route53/testing.
00000000057cb858 b go.itab.*k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go/service/route53.Route53.k8s.io/kubernetes/federation/pkg/dnsprovider/providers/aws/route53/testing.Route53API
000000000188e470 t k8s.io/kubernetes/federation/pkg/dnsprovider/providers/aws/route53/testing.init
00000000057c85db b k8s.io/kubernetes/federation/pkg/dnsprovider/providers/aws/route53/testing.initdone.
FAILED ./hack/../hack/verify-symbols.sh 47s |
@goltermann |
@k8s-bot verify this issue: #IGNORE |
@colhom No idea why this is the only PR hung up on those vet issues, but they're being fixed by @mikedanese in #27558. |
@k8s-bot verify this issue: #IGNORE |
@colhom the vet errors are cleaned up, but the symbols issue does appear to be related to your PR. Take a look at hack/verify-symbols.sh. It's flagging that your PR now builds in symbols named "testing" into hyperkube. @quinton-hoole any ideas? Should we alter the regex at https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/hack/verify-symbols.sh#L32, or alter something in federation code? |
@goltermann @colhom I'm guessing that this might be tripping up the verify-symbols.sh check. The easiest might be to rename that package. I can send in a PR for that. I'm not familiar enough with the aims behind verify-symbols to know for sure whether that would be subverting a good check or not. That package is so minute that I don' think it makes much difference whether it's in or out of the production binaries. |
#27734 should do the trick. |
…vider-route53-testing-package Automatic merge from submit-queue Rename dnsprovider/providers/aws/route53/internal/testing to stubs. Resolves #27586 (comment) cc @colhom @goltermann
Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test". This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry. Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy. |
2 similar comments
Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test". This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry. Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy. |
Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test". This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry. Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy. |
@k8s-bot ok to test |
Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test". This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry. Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy. |
GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 8b2d1f3. |
@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge] |
GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 8b2d1f3. |
Automatic merge from submit-queue |
\cc @nikhiljindal @quinton-hoole