Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix registry addon ReplicationController template #4220

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2019

Conversation

zregvart
Copy link
Contributor

@zregvart zregvart commented May 7, 2019

Running the minikube addons enable registry yields registry was successfully enabled but no registry Pod ends up being run.

I've narrowed it down to this env entry not being quoted.

Logs from kube-addon-manager-minikube Pod show this error:

Error from server (BadRequest): error when creating "/etc/kubernetes/addons/registry-rc.yaml": ReplicationController in version "v1" cannot be handled as a ReplicationController: v1.ReplicationController.Spec: v1.ReplicationControllerSpec.Template: v1.PodTemplateSpec.Spec: v1.PodSpec.Containers: []v1.Container: v1.Container.Env: []v1.EnvVar: v1.EnvVar.Value: ReadString: expects " or n, but found t, error found in #10 byte of ...|,"value":true}],"ima|..., bigger context ...|"name":"REGISTRY_STORAGE_DELETE_ENABLED","value":true}],"image":"registry.hub.docker.com/library/reg|...

Running the `minikube addons enable registry` yields `registry was successfully enabled` but no `registry` Pod ends up being run.

I've narrowed it down to this `env` entry not being quoted.

Logs from `kube-addon-manager-minikube` Pod show this error:

```
Error from server (BadRequest): error when creating "/etc/kubernetes/addons/registry-rc.yaml": ReplicationController in version "v1" cannot be handled as a ReplicationController: v1.ReplicationController.Spec: v1.ReplicationControllerSpec.Template: v1.PodTemplateSpec.Spec: v1.PodSpec.Containers: []v1.Container: v1.Container.Env: []v1.EnvVar: v1.EnvVar.Value: ReadString: expects " or n, but found t, error found in kubernetes#10 byte of ...|,"value":true}],"ima|..., bigger context ...|"name":"REGISTRY_STORAGE_DELETE_ENABLED","value":true}],"image":"registry.hub.docker.com/library/reg|...
```
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label May 7, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @zregvart. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 7, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: zregvart
To fully approve this pull request, please assign additional approvers.
We suggest the following additional approver: afbjorklund

If they are not already assigned, you can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @afbjorklund in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@minikube-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from dlorenc and tstromberg May 7, 2019 20:36
@tstromberg
Copy link
Contributor

@minikube-bot OK to test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels May 7, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants