-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Drop --gcp-project= flag from kubernetes network-proxy presubmits #19079
Drop --gcp-project= flag from kubernetes network-proxy presubmits #19079
Conversation
FYI @kubernetes/ci-signal |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hasheddan, spiffxp The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Drop the use of a specific project and migrate to k8s-infra, let's see if the default gce-project pool over there can satisfy the needs of this job Also make the job optional
75c1c4e
to
c3a8268
Compare
Made the canary job optional so tests don't yell at me to put it on kuberntes-presubmits-blocking testgrid |
/lgtm |
@spiffxp: Updated the
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Part of #18853
Followup to #18889
Let's find out if the gce-project pool in k8s-infra-prow-build meets the needs of these jobs.
Fixing grpc variant directly (ref: #18853 (comment)). If this works, we should revert #19033
Trying out http-connect variant via a canary (ref: #18904 (review))