-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Blog post about cgroup v1 support moving to maintenance mode / KEP-4569 #47069
Conversation
✅ Pull request preview available for checkingBuilt without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
cc @kubernetes/contributor-comms (context: kubernetes/enhancements#4569) |
Hello, I'm Rashan from the 1.31 Release comms team. I'm reaching out with a reminder that the blog ready for review deadline is July 26, 2024. Please let me know how we can help! |
This change just... Misspells "documentation"? |
It's a placeholder. |
To confirm, you're requesting @kubernetes/contributor-comms to review the cgroups v2 blog post (once its available)? |
f6e68fa
to
57ed44b
Compare
PTAL @kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews |
Let's pick a specific publication time; there are several articles due to go out on release day, and it's important that the earliest one out of the set is the release announcement. |
@harche based on our conversation https://github.com/kubernetes/website/pull/47281/files#r1707351032, please update the publication date to August 13th. thanks! |
layout: blog | ||
title: "Kubernetes 1.31: Moving cgroup v1 Support into Maintenance Mode" | ||
date: 2024-08-14 | ||
slug: kubernetes-1-31-moving-cgroup-v1-support-maintenance-mode |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For SEO, how about:
slug: kubernetes-1-31-moving-cgroup-v1-support-maintenance-mode | |
slug: cgroup-v1-support-to-maintenance-mode |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking at other blogs I think we need to have the version mentioned somewhere.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nope; no need.
Thanks @a-mccarthy, I just updated the date to 13th. |
How do you specify time there? |
Use an ISO8601 date (which includes a time); release comms will let you know what to use. |
How about /cc @a-mccarthy |
@harche based on the slack thread i had with @sftim, I think the best date for this blog to go out is August 14th. That way we dont have to worry about adding the timestamp. Do you mind update the date and file name to be August 14th? I apologize for the back and forth on dates and information. Thank you for your patience with me as I figured out the publication schedule. Let me know if you have any questions! cc: @rashansmith |
Done. Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
This is OK to publish.
/hold
🛑 Maintain the hold until Kubernetes v1.31 is released; nobody should manually merge this PR to override the hold 🛑
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Path should be content/en/blog/_posts/2024-08-14-moving-cgroup-v1-support-maintenance-mode-kubernetes-1-31.md
, but we can fix that another time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated, thanks.
[systemd](https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/30852) are | ||
transitioning towards cgroup v2, which provides several benefits over cgroup |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm proposing a change because you wouldn't expect a Google search for “systemd” to take you to systemd/systemd#30852
[systemd](https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/30852) are | |
transitioning towards cgroup v2, which provides several benefits over cgroup | |
[systemd](https://systemd.io/) are | |
[transitioning](https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/30852) towards cgroup v2. | |
Using cgroup v2 provides several benefits over cgroup |
If we like it, we can make that change after this PR is approved and even after it has merged.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated, thanks.
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 5b40335fb0646fb931ca008938a855dc32e51bd9
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: saschagrunert, sftim The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: Harshal Patil <harpatil@redhat.com>
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 83a6b77ac26b867d37114e90d71292396590e5ad
|
/hold cancel |
Adding a blog post about moving the cgroup v1 support to maintenance mode in kubernetes.