Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove control C-0044 (hostPort) from attack tracks #507

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2023

Conversation

YiscahLevySilas1
Copy link
Collaborator

@YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 commented Sep 18, 2023

PR Type:

Refactoring


PR Description:

This PR removes control C-0044 from the attack tracks in the 'controls/C-0044-containerhostport.json' file. The control was previously associated with the 'workload-external-track' and 'service-destruction' attack tracks under the 'Initial Access' category. After this change, the control will no longer be associated with these attack tracks.


PR Main Files Walkthrough:

controls/C-0044-containerhostport.json: The 'attackTracks' section, which previously contained references to 'workload-external-track' and 'service-destruction' under the 'Initial Access' category, has been removed from the file.


User Description:

Overview

Signed-off-by: YiscahLevySilas1 <yiscahls@armosec.io>
@codiumai-pr-agent-free
Copy link
Contributor

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Removing a control from attack tracks
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR is about removing control C-0044 from the attack tracks in the 'controls/C-0044-containerhostport.json' file. The control was previously associated with the 'workload-external-track' and 'service-destruction' attack tracks under the 'Initial Access' category. After this change, the control will no longer be associated with these attack tracks.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Refactoring
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General suggestions: The PR seems to be straightforward and well-structured. The changes are clear and the commit message is descriptive. However, it would be beneficial to include a brief explanation of why this control is being removed from the attack tracks. This could help other contributors understand the reasoning behind this change.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:

    • relevant file: controls/C-0044-containerhostport.json
      suggestion: It would be helpful to add a comment in the code where the control was removed, explaining why it was removed. This can provide context for future contributors who might be looking at this change. [medium]
      relevant line: - "attackTracks": [

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

@YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 changed the title remove control C-0044 from attack tracks remove control C-0044 (hostPort) from attack tracks Sep 18, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

@YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 merged commit 96b1f7e into master Sep 18, 2023
26 checks passed
@YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 deleted the disable-hostport-attackchains branch September 18, 2023 11:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants