report numa sibling and memory bandwidth

[luomingmeng]

What type of PR is this?

Enhancements

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.46296% with 53 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 55.62%. Comparing base (b122f7b) to head (8b92ba9).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head 8b92ba9 differs from pull request most recent head 02f956a. Consider uploading reports for the commit 02f956a to get more accurate results

Files	Patch %	Lines
...nager/fetcher/kubelet/topology/topology_adapter.go	66.19%	17 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️
pkg/metaserver/spd/manager.go	66.66%	14 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
pkg/util/spd.go	66.66%	4 Missing ⚠️
pkg/metaserver/spd/util.go	70.00%	1 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
pkg/metaserver/spd/fetcher.go	71.42%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #533      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   55.67%   55.62%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         552      553       +1     
  Lines       59419    59621     +202     
==========================================
+ Hits        33083    33163      +80     
- Misses      22899    23024     +125     
+ Partials     3437     3434       -3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittest	55.62% <75.46%> (-0.06%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.