This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 22, 2024. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Port is a IntEnum, thus you do not need to use the
.value
here, it's elements can be directly compared to integers out of the box.Also, why comparing if the
in_port
is less thenPort.OFPP_MAX
instead of less or equal to ?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lines 116 to 118 treats valid ports that are not in
Port
class. the function returns so they don't get to be parsed to a instance ofPort
.lines 119 to 125 treats valid ports that are in the
Port
class.Since OFPP_MAX is in the
Port
class, we should let it be parsed.I left the
.value
there because it was already there. (commit 7c7faf7)