Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support to full path of OU within AD infrastructure + option to specify OU to analyze GPOs in (with or without recurse) #16

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Fist0urs
Copy link

@Fist0urs Fist0urs commented May 21, 2018

Hi,

thank you very much for this tool that gives a good basis while analyzing GPOs!

This PR adds the display of the full path of an OU while treating GPOs. Indeed different OUs may have the same name while being located in another location within the AD infrastructure. The variable name was also changed to follow the naming "SOMName" and "SOMPath" of the Get-GPORerport produced XML.

Furthermore the 2nd commit adds the option to specify an OU to analyze GPOs in (with or without recurse). This can be interesting while trying to debug specific GPOs in OUs (like parameter override or inheritance blocked) ;-).

Please note that I'm a not (yet) a PowerShell guy so feel free to give me some feedback regarding implementation :-).

This last feature has been tested only with the "WithFile" option, thus Domain and WithoutFile is not included in this PR.

Cheers!

@Fist0urs Fist0urs changed the title Add support to full path of OU within AD infrastructure Add support to full path of OU within AD infrastructure + option to specify OU to analyze GPOs in (with or without recurse) May 21, 2018
@l0ss
Copy link
Owner

l0ss commented May 25, 2018

i'm super busy atm with work but i will have a look at this asap, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants