-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 222
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: propagate storage_options
to LanceFileWriter
and LanceFileReader
#2840
feat: propagate storage_options
to LanceFileWriter
and LanceFileReader
#2840
Conversation
storage_options
to LanceFileWriter
and LanceFileReader
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for making a PR for this.
Could you add an integration test so we can validate storage options are working? Here is where we have integration tests where we pass storage options to connect to S3: https://github.com/lancedb/lance/blob/main/python/python/tests/test_s3_ddb.py
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work!
@wjones127 I have added the IT. However, will the wheel used for ITs be generated using local changes or will it pull a released version? |
@wjones127 Actually there was a race when I requested a re-review and when you approved. Can you re-stamp? |
They are always generated with local changes. |
The PR propogates the storage_options to the LanceFileWriter and LanceFileReader and updates the code to create the object reader.
How is this tested?
Installed the package with local change:
maturin develop
Verified the following code didn't work before but works now