Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: make it easier to see breaking change that fails ci job #2869

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 12, 2024

Conversation

wjones127
Copy link
Contributor

@wjones127 wjones127 commented Sep 12, 2024

Forgot to increment the version in #2829

@github-actions github-actions bot added python ci Github Action or Test issues labels Sep 12, 2024
@wjones127 wjones127 merged commit 663eb95 into lancedb:main Sep 12, 2024
22 of 24 checks passed
@wjones127 wjones127 deleted the fix-breaking-change branch September 12, 2024 15:21
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.87%. Comparing base (f0fc411) to head (afc6bff).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2869      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.86%   77.87%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         231      231              
  Lines       70373    70373              
  Branches    70373    70373              
==========================================
+ Hits        54795    54804       +9     
  Misses      12449    12449              
+ Partials     3129     3120       -9     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 77.87% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci Github Action or Test issues python
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants