SQLite-backed Entity Memory #5129
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
thanks @JoseHervas, looks like a good start! would it be possible to add an example notebook? |
dev2049
added
03 enhancement
|
Hey @dev2049 for sure 👍 Here's the example notebook: docs/modules/memory/examples/entity_memory_with_sqlite.ipynb |
dev2049
removed
the
needs documentation
dev2049
added
the
lgtm
|
lgtm, thanks @JoseHervas! |
vowelparrot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2023
# SQLite-backed Entity Memory Following the initiative of #2397 I think it would be helpful to be able to persist Entity Memory on disk by default Co-authored-by: Dev 2049 <dev.dev2049@gmail.com>
Merged
|
I think SQLiteEntityStore class is missing "conn" property. |
Undertone0809
pushed a commit
to Undertone0809/langchain
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2023
# SQLite-backed Entity Memory Following the initiative of langchain-ai#2397 I think it would be helpful to be able to persist Entity Memory on disk by default Co-authored-by: Dev 2049 <dev.dev2049@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
SQLite-backed Entity Memory
Following the initiative of #2397 I think it would be helpful to be able to persist Entity Memory on disk by default
Who can review?
Community members can review the PR once tests pass. Tag maintainers/contributors who might be interested:
@dev2049