Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Remove duplicate 'response_format' parameter from model YAML files #11531

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

zkytech
Copy link
Contributor

@zkytech zkytech commented Dec 10, 2024

Summary

Remove duplicate 'response_format' parameter from multiple Tongyi model YAML files,

Tip

Close issue syntax: Fixes #<issue number> or Resolves #<issue number>, see documentation for more details.

Screenshots

image

Checklist

Important

Please review the checklist below before submitting your pull request.

  • This change requires a documentation update, included: Dify Document
  • I understand that this PR may be closed in case there was no previous discussion or issues. (This doesn't apply to typos!)
  • I've added a test for each change that was introduced, and I tried as much as possible to make a single atomic change.
  • I've updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I ran dev/reformat(backend) and cd web && npx lint-staged(frontend) to appease the lint gods

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 10, 2024
@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Dec 11, 2024
@crazywoola crazywoola merged commit fbc4ca9 into langgenius:main Dec 11, 2024
5 checks passed
iamjoel pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
…es (#11531)

Co-authored-by: zhangkunyuan <zhangkunyuan@cmhi.chinamobile.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⚙️ feat:model-runtime lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants