Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @hj24, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request implements a new, highly efficient, and resilient caching layer for retrieving tenant subscription plans in bulk. By introducing Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a caching layer for bulk fetching tenant plans, which is a great feature for improving performance and reducing load on the billing API. The implementation is solid, using Redis mget and pipelines for efficient batch operations, and includes robust error handling and fallbacks. The accompanying integration tests are comprehensive and cover many edge cases, which is excellent.
I have a couple of minor suggestions to improve code clarity and style. One is about simplifying a redundant exception handler, and the other is a small style fix in the new tests.
Important
Fixes #<issue number>.Summary
Screenshots
Checklist
dev/reformat(backend) andcd web && npx lint-staged(frontend) to appease the lint gods