Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(issue 744): use pythonic notation in doc of aggregation functions #771

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alixdamman
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@alixdamman alixdamman added this to the 0.31 milestone Jun 7, 2019
@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on ReviewNB: https://app.reviewnb.com/larray-project/larray/pull/771

Visit www.reviewnb.com to know how we simplify your Jupyter Notebook workflows.

larray/example.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
larray/example.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
larray/example.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
title: Demographic datasets for a small selection of countries in Europe
source: demo_jpan, demo_fasec, demo_magec and demo_marcz tables from Eurostat
citizenship: citizenship ['TOTAL' 'NAT' 'FOR' 'STLS' 'UNK'] (5)
country: country ['Belgium' 'France' 'Germany'] (3)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The representation for axes in .summary seems odd. Why do we repeat the axis name? Aslo, couldn't we make that clearer by grouping objects by type. eg:

Metadata:
    ...
Arrays:
    ...
Axes:
    ...
Groups:
    ...

@alixdamman alixdamman modified the milestones: 0.31, 0.32 Aug 1, 2019
@alixdamman alixdamman force-pushed the 744_use_pythonic_notation_in_doc branch 2 times, most recently from 822e922 to f439684 Compare August 5, 2019 13:30
@alixdamman alixdamman force-pushed the 744_use_pythonic_notation_in_doc branch from f439684 to aef1580 Compare August 27, 2019 09:59
@alixdamman alixdamman removed this from the 0.32 milestone Oct 2, 2019
@alixdamman alixdamman added this to the 0.33 milestone Oct 22, 2019
@alixdamman alixdamman removed this from the 0.33 milestone Jun 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants