Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
refactor: Revert middlewares to antehandler (part 2/2: posthandler) (c…
…osmos#11985) ## Description We decided to remove middlewares, and revert to antehandlers (exactly like in v045) for this release. A better middleware solution will be implemented after v046. ref: cosmos#11955 This PR is part 2 of 2: - part 1: Revert baseapp and middlewares to v0.45.4 - part 2: Add posthandler, tips, priority Depends on: - [x] cosmos#11979 --- Suggestion for reviewers: - Apart from correctness, I would also like someone to review **exhaustiveness**. I.e. all changes we made in v046 into the [middleware folder](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/tree/v0.46.0-beta2/x/auth/middleware) are reflected in this PR, and that I didn't forget anything. I found the following ones: - add a TxFeeChecker in DeductFee - add a ExtensionChecker in ExtCheckerDecorator - add a TipDecorator --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
- Loading branch information